Al-Falah University Responds After Doctors' Arrest in Terror Case
Al-Falah University breaks silence on doctors' terror arrest

Al-Falah University has broken its silence days after two doctors associated with the institution were arrested in connection with an alleged terror module. The university issued an official statement on November 12, 2025, seeking to clarify its position amid the ongoing investigation.

University Breaks Silence

The educational institution based in Faridabad finally addressed the situation publicly after maintaining silence since the arrests were first reported. The university emphasized its commitment to legal compliance and cooperation with investigative authorities in its carefully worded statement released to the media.

"We wish to make it clear that Al-Falah University operates with complete transparency and adheres to all legal requirements," the statement read. The institution stressed that it would fully cooperate with law enforcement agencies while maintaining the privacy and dignity of all parties involved.

The Arrest Details

The case came to light when two medical doctors with connections to the university were taken into custody by security agencies investigating what has been described as a terror module. While specific details about the charges remain limited due to the sensitive nature of the investigation, authorities have indicated the arrests are part of a broader security operation.

The timing of the university's response suggests the institution felt compelled to address growing public speculation and media attention surrounding the case. The statement was formally published at 12:55 PM IST, marking the first official communication from the university regarding the matter.

Institutional Response and Future Implications

Educational institutions facing such situations often walk a delicate line between protecting their reputation and demonstrating compliance with legal processes. Al-Falah University's statement appears designed to reassure students, parents, and stakeholders while avoiding any commentary that might interfere with the judicial process.

The university did not specify the exact nature of the doctors' association with the institution, leaving unclear whether they were faculty members, researchers, or had other roles. This ambiguity has led to increased public interest in how the situation will develop as more information emerges from official sources.

As the investigation continues, the case has drawn attention to security protocols within educational institutions and the vetting processes for professionals associated with them. The university's measured response indicates an awareness of the serious implications such cases can have on institutional credibility and public trust.