Faculty members at the Government College of Art in Chandigarh have formally raised serious concerns regarding the appointment of external examiners for upcoming Panjab University practical examinations. In a written request submitted to the principal, they highlighted the lack of clear norms for remuneration and travel allowances, which is causing significant operational hurdles.
Core Issue: Unclear Financial Terms Deter Examiners
In a letter dated November 13, the concerned coordinators pointed out a critical problem: several potential external examiners are refusing to participate in the examination process for the November-December 2025 session. The primary reason cited is the absence of any written assurance or official communication detailing the payment they will receive for their services.
The faculty explicitly stated that neither their own college nor Panjab University has issued clear, documented terms outlining the fee structure and travel expense (TA/DA) reimbursements. This ambiguity, they argue, makes it exceptionally difficult to secure the necessary examiners and threatens the smooth conduct of the practical assessments.
Contrast with Past and Other University Practices
The letter draws a sharp comparison with procedures followed in earlier years. Previously, Panjab University itself managed the entire process of appointing external examiners and handling their compensation, which provided clarity and assurance. The current system, where the college is involved in the nomination process but lacks authority or information on payments, is described as opaque and inefficient.
Furthermore, the faculty members noted that other universities reportedly communicate all details regarding pay scales and travel allowances to examiners upfront at the time of appointment. This transparent approach stands in stark contrast to the present uncertain arrangement at Panjab University, creating dissatisfaction and reluctance among qualified professionals.
Official Response and Forwarded Requests
Along with their formal request for clarification, the faculty enclosed a department-wise list of proposed external examiners, compiled as per Panjab University's instructions. They have urged the principal to forward this entire matter, along with their concerns, to the university administration for immediate resolution.
Handwritten remarks on the document indicate that directions were given to forward the request to Panjab University. However, at the time of reporting, the principal had not provided any substantive response or solution to the concerns raised by the teaching staff.
The situation underscores a growing administrative challenge that could directly impact the fair and timely evaluation of students if not resolved promptly before the 2025 examination cycle begins.
