Actor-Director Challenges Massive Lawsuit Claims
Justin Baldoni, the actor and director behind the upcoming film adaptation of 'It Ends With Us,' has officially requested a federal court to dismiss the staggering $161 million lawsuit filed against him by his co-star Blake Lively. The legal move came on Thursday when Baldoni submitted a formal motion arguing that Lively cannot substantiate her serious allegations.
Legal Grounds for Dismissal
According to court documents obtained by media outlets, Baldoni's legal team contends that Blake Lively lacks evidence to support her claims of sexual harassment, defamation, and conspiracy. The motion specifically challenges Lively's ability to prove what they characterize as 'speculative' contract claims, emphasizing that she worked as an independent contractor rather than a formal employee.
In a strategic filing made just before the East Coast deadline, Baldoni and his attorney Alexandra Shapiro submitted a motion for summary judgment. The document asserts that no reasonable jury would find him guilty based on the current evidence. The legal team emphasized that allegations concerning lost profits must meet the standard of reasonable certainty and cannot be based on speculative or imaginary calculations.
Request to Seal Documents
Adding another layer to the legal battle, Baldoni has requested temporary sealing of certain documents from public view. His attorney, Shapiro, clarified in court filings that while the Wayfarer Parties don't believe most material should remain confidential, they've asked for a one-week delay on ruling about sealing documents to allow all parties to discuss the matter.
Currently, several key pieces of evidence remain inaccessible to the public, including Baldoni's October deposition and text message exchanges between him, Wayfarer Studios executives, and other team members involved in the production.
The high-stakes legal confrontation is scheduled to proceed in New York on March 9, 2026, unless the court grants Baldoni's motion for dismissal. This case represents one of the most significant legal disputes in recent Hollywood history, with substantial financial implications for all parties involved.
