Colva Fishermen Access Dispute: Delhi Party Denies Claims, Offers Temporary Solution
In the ongoing dispute over fishermen's access in Colva, Goa, a public notice issued on behalf of a Delhi-based party has categorically denied false allegations regarding the existence of an access route through their property. The party, represented by advocate Seoula Vaz, stated that according to official records, no fishermen from the local community have ever used their land as an access point.
Party's Stance and Temporary Offer
The Delhi party emphasized that all claims of fishermen utilizing their property for access are baseless and unfounded. However, in a move aimed at maintaining peace and harmony in the area, the party has offered to permit restricted temporary access to the neighbouring property. This offer is conditional upon mutual understanding and reciprocation from the other party, and is intended to be in effect only until the proposed road from the northern side is completed.
Background of the Property and Permissions
The public notice detailed that the land under Survey No. 77/1-K and 77/1-K-1 was purchased by a group of friends with the intention of building residential villas. The party asserted that all requisite permissions have been duly obtained from key authorities, including the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority (GCZMA), the Town and Country Planning Department (TCP), and the Village Panchayat of Colva. This underscores their legal standing and compliance with local regulations.
Past Courtesy and Current Allegations
According to the notice, the party had temporarily permitted access in the past as a courtesy and gesture of cooperation. This was done at the request of the legal owner, Maria Imaculada Olga Duarte e Vaz, to allow her authorised persons and materials to be shifted through their property. Advocate Seoula Vaz clarified that this was a one-time goodwill gesture and should not be misconstrued as establishing a permanent access right.
She further stated, "However, taking advantage of this gesture of goodwill, a third party claiming access is unfounded and unfair." Additionally, Vaz pointed out that Olga is neither a resident of Colva nor belongs to the fishing community, implying that the claims might be driven by external interests rather than local needs.
Implications and Future Outlook
The dispute highlights tensions between property development and traditional community access in coastal areas like Colva. While the Delhi party maintains its legal rights and denies any historical access by fishermen, its offer of temporary restricted access suggests a willingness to compromise for communal peace. The resolution may hinge on the completion of the proposed northern road, which could provide a permanent solution to the access issue. Stakeholders, including local authorities and community representatives, are likely to monitor developments closely to ensure fairness and adherence to legal frameworks.
