A legal complaint has been filed in Bengaluru against Bihar's Chief Minister, Nitish Kumar, following an alleged incident involving a woman's hijab. The case, registered by a city-based advocate, has escalated the matter into a potential legal and political controversy.
Details of the Legal Complaint
The complaint was formally submitted by Advocate Owaiz Hussain S in Bengaluru. The core allegation is that Nitish Kumar physically grabbed a woman's hijab. The legal document outlines the specifics of the incident as presented by the complainant.
Beyond the local police station, the advocate has proactively marked the complaint to several high-ranking authorities to ensure attention. These include the Bengaluru Police Commissioner and the Chairperson of the Karnataka State Commission for Women. This step indicates a strategy to seek intervention at the highest levels of the city's law enforcement and the state's women's rights body.
Formal Procedure and Potential Repercussions
The filing of a First Information Report (FIR) is now a subject of police procedure. Law enforcement officials will examine the complaint's merits to decide on further legal action. Such complaints against a sitting chief minister from another state are rare and carry significant political weight.
The incident, as claimed in the complaint, touches upon sensitive issues of religious expression and personal space. The involvement of the women's commission highlights the gender and rights-based angle being pursued by the complainant.
Broader Context and Next Steps
This development, dated 16 December 2025, adds a new layer to the ongoing national discourse on religious symbols and the conduct of public figures. The Bengaluru police's handling of the complaint will be closely watched, as it intersects state politics with legal accountability.
The next course of action depends on the preliminary investigation by the Bengaluru police. Their decision on whether to proceed with a formal investigation could have wider implications. The complaint ensures the incident remains in the public and legal domain, pending official scrutiny.
