Godhra Sessions Court Imposes Decade-Long Sentence in Bovine Meat Case
A sessions court in Godhra, Gujarat, has delivered a stringent verdict, sentencing two individuals to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment for being caught in possession of 53 kilograms of bovine meat. The case, which unfolded on the streets of Godhra, highlights the strict enforcement of the amended Gujarat Animal Preservation Act.
Police Interception and Arrest Details
The incident occurred on July 9, 2024, when a police patrol on Hamirpur Road in Godhra noticed a stationary car alongside a motorcycle. The accused, identified as Mehboob Saburiya and Farhan Saburiya, both residents of Godhra, were sitting inside the car as it had broken down. Two other individuals on the motorcycle managed to flee the scene upon the police's approach, but Mehboob and Farhan were apprehended.
During a search of the vehicle, officers discovered a bag on the car seat containing two knives and two axes. Further inspection of the car's boot revealed a urea bag packed with meat. The police promptly registered an offence, and subsequent forensic tests confirmed the meat to be of bovine origin, leading to serious charges under state law.
Investigation and Legal Proceedings
In their interrogation, Mehboob and Farhan disclosed that they had procured the meat from Salim Bhaijamal. Based on this information, the police arrested Bhaijamal, and a chargesheet was filed against all three accused. The case was brought before the court of additional sessions judge R R Patel, where the evidence was meticulously examined.
The court found the evidence against Mehboob and Farhan to be compelling and sufficient for conviction. They were sentenced to 10 years in prison under the provisions of the amended Gujarat Animal Preservation Act, which imposes severe penalties for offenses related to bovine slaughter and possession. Additionally, the court imposed a fine of Rs 2 lakh on each of the convicted individuals.
Acquittal of Third Accused
In a notable turn, the court acquitted Salim Bhaijamal, the alleged supplier. The decision was based on the fact that the case against him relied solely on the statements of Mehboob and Farhan, without corroborating evidence. This underscores the judicial emphasis on substantive proof in legal proceedings, ensuring that convictions are grounded in solid evidence rather than mere allegations.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the stringent legal framework in Gujarat concerning bovine preservation, with the court's ruling reflecting a zero-tolerance approach towards violations. The verdict has drawn attention to the broader implications of such laws in the region, emphasizing the importance of adherence to state regulations on animal-related offenses.
