Hundreds of legal professionals took to the streets of Guwahati on Thursday in a powerful demonstration against the proposed relocation of the Gauhati High Court from its prime location in the city's heart to the outskirts.
Historic Institution Faces Uncertain Future
The protesting advocates, dressed in their distinctive black robes, marched from the High Court premises to the Deputy Commissioner's office, creating a striking visual spectacle in the city center. They carried placards and shouted slogans, demanding that the government reconsider what they call a "disastrous move" that would affect millions of citizens.
Why Lawyers Are Fighting This Battle
The legal community has raised several critical concerns about the proposed relocation:
- Accessibility for common people: The current city-center location allows easy access for litigants from across the northeastern states
- Heritage and historical significance: The High Court has operated from its current premises for decades, becoming an integral part of Guwahati's identity
- Infrastructure challenges: The proposed new location lacks proper public transportation and basic amenities
- Economic impact: Moving the court would adversely affect local businesses that have developed around the current location
Government's Perspective vs Public Interest
While the government cites space constraints and modernization needs as reasons for the relocation, lawyers argue that the move serves commercial interests rather than public welfare. "This isn't just about lawyers' convenience; it's about access to justice for every citizen of Northeast India," one senior advocate emphasized during the protest.
What's at Stake for Northeast India
The Gauhati High Court serves not just Assam but several other northeastern states, making its location a regional concern. The potential move to the outskirts could create significant barriers for people traveling from remote areas who depend on public transportation and affordable accommodation near the court premises.
The legal community has vowed to continue their agitation until the government provides a satisfactory resolution, setting the stage for a prolonged confrontation between the judiciary and the administration over this sensitive issue.
