Madras High Court Reserves Judgment on Plea to Cancel YouTuber's Interim Bail
In a significant legal development, the Madras High Court in Chennai has reserved its orders on a petition filed by the Tamil Nadu government. The plea seeks the cancellation of interim bail granted to YouTuber Savukku Shankar on medical grounds, with the court concluding final hearings on Wednesday.
Arguments Presented by Both Sides
A division bench comprising Justice P Velmurugan and Justice M Jothiraman heard the case, which was initiated by the Saidapet police. The police argued vehemently for the bail to be revoked, alleging that Shankar had repeatedly violated the conditions of his bail. They contended that his conduct had severely hampered the ongoing investigations into the cases against him.
Prosecutor R Muniyapparaj reinforced this stance, stating that the police are prepared to provide an undertaking to ensure Shankar receives medical care at a government hospital if necessary. He emphasized that the probe has been totally defeated due to Shankar's actions, underscoring the urgency of the matter.
Dispute Over Medical Condition
The case took a contentious turn regarding Shankar's health. The Tamil Nadu government alleged that his medical condition was not as severe as portrayed by his mother in a habeas corpus petition. To verify this, a court-appointed medical team from Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital (RGGGH) conducted an evaluation and submitted a detailed report.
However, senior advocate V Raghavachari, representing Shankar, challenged the report's validity. He argued that it lacks the permissible limits typically found in standard lab reports and warned that incarcerating Shankar could lead to a deterioration in his health. Additionally, Raghavachari highlighted Shankar's responsibility to care for his aged mother, adding a personal dimension to the legal arguments.
Court's Stance and Final Proceedings
During the hearing, the bench made it unequivocally clear that bail automatically stands cancelled in the event of any violation of its conditions. This statement set a firm precedent as the court deliberates on the final order. The reservation of orders marks a critical pause in the proceedings, with all parties awaiting the court's decision, which could have broader implications for bail enforcement and medical considerations in legal cases.
The outcome of this case is being closely watched, as it touches on issues of legal compliance, health rights, and the balance between individual liberties and judicial oversight in Tamil Nadu.
