Barry J Pollack: The Lawyer Defending Both Julian Assange & Venezuela's President
Maduro's Lawyer Barry Pollack Also Defended Julian Assange

Prominent American attorney Barry J Pollack has stepped into the international spotlight once again, this time representing the President of Venezuela following his dramatic capture. Pollack, who previously defended the controversial WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, has now taken up the legal defence for the Venezuelan leader, promising a fierce courtroom battle.

Who Is Barry J Pollack?

Barry J Pollack is a seasoned defence lawyer based in Washington D.C., known for taking on high-profile and politically sensitive cases. His legal career gained significant international attention when he represented Julian Assange, the founder of the whistleblowing platform WikiLeaks, in complex extradition proceedings. Pollack's expertise lies in navigating the intricate intersection of national security law, international relations, and criminal defence, making him a sought-after attorney for clients facing charges from the United States government.

The Venezuela Case: A New Challenge

The latest development unfolded on 06 January 2026, when Pollack confirmed he would be challenging the legal basis for his client's arrest and the charges filed by US authorities. After learning of the Venezuelan President's capture, Pollack promptly addressed the US District Court, signalling his intent to mount a robust defence. He indicated that he would contest both the specific allegations and the fundamental legality of the arrest itself, setting the stage for a protracted legal confrontation with significant geopolitical implications.

Legal Strategy and Broader Implications

Pollack's immediate move to challenge the charges underscores a legal strategy focused on procedural and jurisdictional grounds. His experience from the Assange case, which involved similar debates over extradition and political persecution, is expected to inform his approach. This case immediately draws parallels to his past work, highlighting a pattern of defending individuals whom the US government views as adversaries. The dual representation of both Julian Assange and Nicolas Maduro positions Pollack as a central figure in some of the most contentious legal battles between the US and international political actors. The outcome of this case could influence future US actions against foreign leaders and redefine the boundaries of international legal pursuit.

The world now watches as Barry J Pollack prepares his arguments, promising a legal showdown that will be closely followed by governments, human rights organisations, and legal experts across the globe. The proceedings are likely to delve deep into questions of sovereignty, the limits of US judicial reach, and the definition of political crimes.