Grammy-winning rapper Megan Thee Stallion made her sixth appearance in a Miami federal court today, marking what could be the final day of testimony in her high-profile defamation lawsuit against online commentator Milagro Gramz. The emotionally charged case has captured nationwide attention as it addresses critical issues of digital harassment and AI-generated explicit content.
The Core of the Legal Battle
At the heart of the lawsuit are allegations that Milagro Gramz, whose legal name is Milagro Cooper, weaponized her online platform to spread damaging content about the rapper. The most serious accusation involves Cooper allegedly directing her followers toward an AI-generated sexual video featuring Megan's likeness without her consent. Court documents describe how the harassment campaign extended beyond the deepfake video to include false narratives about Megan's personal life and mental health.
During her emotional testimony, Megan, who appears in court under her legal name Megan Pete, described how the months of online attacks left her seeking therapy. "Though I know it was not me on that video, I felt defeated because the harm had been done," she told the court in a moment that highlighted the psychological toll of the ordeal.
Emotional Testimony and Broader Implications
The trial, which began in late October, has revealed disturbing patterns of digital harassment that extend beyond typical online criticism. Megan testified about how she felt particularly victimized because Gramz "wanted it to be real," referring to the explicit deepfake video. The proceedings have placed the South Florida resident at the center of a broader conversation about the real-world consequences of viral misinformation and AI-driven abuse.
Court filings allege that Cooper's actions "knows no bounds" and describe her online community as having "cult-like" characteristics. The case has also uncovered connections between Cooper and rapper Tory Lanez, who was convicted in 2023 for shooting Megan in 2020. Megan's legal team claims Cooper acted as a "mouthpiece" for Lanez, receiving support and alleged incentives for coverage favorable to him.
A Landmark Case in Digital Age Defamation
As closing arguments approach, this case stands as one of the most closely watched legal battles involving celebrity rights in the digital era. The trial has featured tense cross-examinations, debates over deleted messages, and witness accounts that paint a comprehensive picture of modern online harassment.
The outcome could set important precedents for distinguishing between protected opinion and targeted defamation in an age of high-speed online commentary. Megan's case represents a significant attempt to establish legal boundaries for digital behavior, particularly concerning the malicious use of artificial intelligence technology to create non-consensual explicit content.
With the testimony phase now concluded, the federal court in Miami will soon hear closing arguments that could determine not only the outcome of this specific case but also influence how similar cases of digital harassment and AI abuse are handled in the future.
