Nagpur High Court Demands Full Compliance on Tree Concrete Removal
The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has issued a stern directive to the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC), criticizing its delays in removing concrete encasements from trees across the city. During a hearing on Tuesday, the bench comprising Justice Anil Kilor and Justice Raj Wakode made it unequivocally clear that partial compliance is unacceptable and ordered the NMC to ensure all affected trees are freed from concrete before the next scheduled hearing.
Progress Report and Court's Dissatisfaction
During the proceedings, the court was presented with a progress report from the NMC, which indicated that concrete had been removed from 2,569 out of the 3,691 trees identified as being encased. However, the bench emphasized that this partial progress does not meet the required standards, noting that adequate time had already been granted for the task. The court orally directed the NMC to submit confirmation at the next hearing that all trees have been liberated from concrete, stressing that the corporation must expedite work on the remaining 1,122 trees.
Background of the Public Interest Litigations
The directions emerged during a joint hearing of two significant public interest litigations (PILs). One PIL was initiated suo motu by the court back in 2018, while the other was filed by environmental expert Sharad Patil and other concerned citizens. These petitions aim to address two critical issues: curbing large-scale tree felling undertaken in the name of urban development and ensuring the removal of concrete that severely restricts the natural growth and health of trees.
Records submitted to the court reveal that out of the total affected trees, 3,360 fall directly under the jurisdiction of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. In a previous hearing, the bench had clarified that the responsibility for removing concrete rests squarely with the NMC, regardless of which authority controls the roads where the trees are located. The court also stated that the respective road-controlling authorities would be required to reimburse the civic body for any expenses incurred during the removal process.
Legal Representation and Next Steps
During the hearing, amicus curiae Radhika Bajaj and NS Rao represented the state government, while Jemini Kasat appeared on behalf of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. The court has listed the matter for further hearing in the second week of June, by which time the NMC is expected to demonstrate complete compliance with the removal orders.
This case highlights the ongoing judicial oversight of environmental protection measures in urban areas, underscoring the importance of preserving green cover amidst rapid development. The court's firm stance serves as a reminder to municipal authorities of their duty to safeguard natural resources and adhere to environmental regulations without delay.
