National Human Rights Commission Takes Strong Action Against Odisha Police Over Fraud Case
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has issued a stern rebuke to the Odisha police force, citing alleged inaction and significant procedural failures in a high-value fraud case amounting to Rs 6.2 crore. In a decisive move, the commission has mandated the state government to initiate a time-bound departmental inquiry targeting senior officers involved, underscoring a commitment to accountability and justice.
Details of the Complaint and Commission's Intervention
According to official records released on Monday, the NHRC's order, passed in February of this year, stems from a complaint filed by Prajna Prakash Nayak on April 23, 2025. Nayak alleged that he and his wife fell victim to extensive fraud, forgery, and cheating, with losses totaling Rs 6.2 crore. The complainant further accused the police of mishandling the case, allowing the accused and errant officers to evade consequences while his family was falsely implicated.
In response, the NHRC directed its investigation division to conduct a spot enquiry in Bhubaneswar from September 8 to 12, 2025. The subsequent report highlighted severe lapses, including delays in registering the complaint and inadequate follow-up actions. Based on these findings, the commission recommended firm disciplinary measures against officers from the Infocity and Airfield police stations, as well as the concerned deputy commissioner of police.
Commission's Directives and State Response
The NHRC has taken several critical steps to address the issue:
- Sent the investigation report to the Chief Secretary of Odisha and the Director General of Police (DGP), requesting their responses within four weeks.
- Ordered the DGP to conduct a time-bound departmental inquiry against the implicated officers and take appropriate action.
- Issued a notice under Section 18 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, to the Chief Secretary to consider compensation for the complainant due to alleged human rights violations from police inaction.
A commissionerate police spokesperson confirmed receipt of the order, stating, "The department has received the order and will conduct a detailed enquiry into the matter. The department will present a fact-finding report before the commission as ordered in the next date of hearing." The case is scheduled for review after the four-week response period.
Broader Implications and Legal Framework
This case underscores the NHRC's proactive role in safeguarding human rights and ensuring police accountability. By invoking Section 18 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, the commission emphasizes the legal obligation to provide redress for victims of institutional negligence. The directive for compensation highlights the tangible impacts of procedural lapses on individuals' rights and well-being.
In a communication issued by Deputy Registrar (Law) Indrajeet Kumar, public authorities have been instructed to submit additional or complete reports by April 19, 2026, for further commission consideration. This timeline ensures ongoing oversight and reinforces the urgency of addressing such grievances promptly.
The NHRC's actions in this Rs 6.2 crore fraud case serve as a critical reminder of the need for diligent law enforcement and robust mechanisms to protect citizens from malpractice. As the inquiry progresses, it will be closely watched for its potential to set precedents in handling similar issues across India.
