Supreme Court Continues Hearing on Sonam Wangchuk's Detention Under NSA
Supreme Court Hearing on Sonam Wangchuk's NSA Detention Continues

Supreme Court to Continue Hearing Plea Against Sonam Wangchuk's Detention

The Supreme Court of India is set to continue hearing a petition filed by Gitanjali J Angmo, the wife of jailed climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, challenging his detention under the National Security Act (NSA). A bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and P B Varale will preside over the matter today, February 11, 2026.

Health Concerns and Judicial Scrutiny

In earlier proceedings, the top court had expressed concern over Wangchuk's health, noting that it is "not that good" and inquired if the Centre might reconsider his detention. The court had previously allowed Wangchuk to be examined by a specialist doctor after he complained of frequent stomach pain, with the medical report subsequently submitted for judicial review.

Representing the Centre, Additional Solicitor-General KM Nataraj informed the bench that he would take instructions and apprise the court on the matter, indicating ongoing deliberations between the judiciary and government authorities.

Background of the Case

Sonam Wangchuk was detained on September 26, 2025, under the NSA, a law that permits governments to act pre-emptively against individuals deemed a threat to public order or national security. He was later transferred to Jodhpur. His detention followed violent protests in Ladakh just two days prior, which resulted in four fatalities and 90 injuries. These protests were part of demands for statehood and Sixth Schedule status for the Union territory.

The government has accused Wangchuk of inciting the violence, linking his activism to the unrest. The NSA detention has sparked significant legal and public debate, with this Supreme Court hearing being a critical juncture in the case.

Legal and Activist Context

Wangchuk, known for his environmental and social advocacy in Ladakh, has become a focal point in discussions about civil liberties and national security. The hearing underscores the tension between state powers under security laws and individual rights, particularly in regions with ongoing political demands.

The Supreme Court's involvement highlights the judiciary's role in balancing these interests, especially when health and detention conditions are at stake. As the hearing progresses, observers await further developments that could impact Wangchuk's legal status and broader implications for activist detentions in India.