In a significant disciplinary action, the Kerala Police has dismissed a senior officer for persistently criticizing the force on social media platforms. The order, issued by the Pathanamthitta district police chief, terminates the service of civil police officer U Umesh, who was already under suspension.
Chronology of Disciplinary Action
U Umesh was placed under suspension in May 2024 while he was serving at the Aranmula police station. The suspension followed initial social media posts deemed insulting to the police department. However, even during his suspension period, Umesh continued his criticism online, which ultimately led to the dismissal order.
The dismissal order, issued by District Police Chief R Anand, cited several serious violations. It stated that Umesh shared a picture of the show-cause notice served to him on social media and responded to it in a mocking manner. The officer was also found to have failed in maintaining the discipline expected from a person in uniform.
A History of Disciplinary Issues
Umesh, a native of Koyilandy in Kozhikode, joined the police service in 2003. A review of his service record revealed a pattern of disciplinary problems. Between 2017 and 2022, while serving in Kozhikode, he faced disciplinary action an astounding 11 times.
The dismissal order detailed further misconduct. It noted that Umesh justified a suspect considered a threat to internal security, failed to appear for testimony collection when required, and provided responses that disparaged his superiors and the government. After evaluating his overall service and conduct, the authorities concluded he was unfit to continue in the job.
Implications and Next Steps
The order explicitly stated that allowing Umesh to remain in service would undermine the morale and reputation of the entire police force. This dismissal underscores the Kerala Police's strict stance on maintaining discipline and public respect for the institution.
Umesh has stated his intention to challenge the dismissal. He plans to appeal against the order to the Deputy Inspector General (DIG). If his appeal is rejected at that level, the matter is expected to proceed to court, setting the stage for a legal battle over the limits of free speech for public servants and disciplinary authority.
This case highlights the ongoing tension between individual expression and the stringent conduct rules governing police personnel in India. It serves as a stark reminder of the consequences officers may face for public criticism of their own department.
