CPM Activist Mostari Banu Files First Legal Challenge Against Bengal Electoral List Revision Process
In a significant development, Mostari Banu, a 44-year-old CPM worker from Bhagawangola in Murshidabad, has emerged as the first individual to file a legal suit against the electoral list revision process in Bengal. While not a heavyweight political figure, her petition has gained prominence as it is set to be heard in the Supreme Court on Monday alongside cases filed by prominent personalities.
Petition Listed for Supreme Court Hearing Alongside High-Profile Cases
Mostari Banu's petition is scheduled for a hearing on Monday, where it will be considered along with those of notable figures such as poet Joy Goswami, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, Trinamool MPs Derek O'Brien and Dola Sen, state Congress president Subhankar Sarkar, and the Sanatani Sansad. She will be present in the Supreme Court with her lawyer, Sabyasachi Chatterjee, to argue her case.
Nine Key Concerns Raised in the Legal Challenge
Mostari Banu moved the Supreme Court after the Election Commission published its SIR notification for Bengal on November 11. In her petition, she has listed nine specific concerns regarding the electoral list revision process. "I felt many of the EC's actions were unethical and illegal and would cause harassment," Mostari stated. Her concerns include:
- The use of unvetted software by the Election Commission.
- Photograph specifications that could cause unease among Muslim women.
- Issues related to Madhyamik admit cards.
- Arbitrary SIR summons issued during the revision process.
These points highlight potential procedural flaws and ethical violations that could impact voter registration and participation in Bengal.
Background and Implications of the Legal Battle
The electoral list revision process, known as SIR, has sparked controversy in Bengal, with multiple stakeholders raising objections. Mostari Banu's early legal action underscores grassroots-level concerns about transparency and fairness in electoral procedures. Her involvement as a CPM worker adds a political dimension to the case, reflecting broader tensions in the state's political landscape.
As the Supreme Court prepares to hear these petitions, the outcome could have significant implications for how electoral lists are revised in Bengal and potentially set precedents for similar processes across India. The hearing on Monday is expected to draw attention from political observers and legal experts alike.
