The highest temporal seat of Sikhism, Akal Takht, and the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) have launched strong opposition against the central government's recent proposal concerning prime land in Chandigarh. This development has sparked significant concern within the Sikh community nationwide.
Religious Leaders Unite in Protest
Akal Takht Jathedar Giani Raghbir Singh has taken a firm stance against the Centre's plan to acquire 2.5 acres of land designated as an 'Environment and Vistas of Peripheries and Landscape (EVPL)' zone in Chandigarh. The religious leader expressed deep concern about the potential implications of this move, emphasizing that it represents a direct threat to Sikh interests and heritage.
In his official statement, Giani Raghbir Singh highlighted that this land holds significant importance for the Sikh community. He described the central government's proposal as "anti-Sikh" and demanded its immediate withdrawal. The Jathedar warned that if the government proceeds with this plan, it would face strong resistance from the entire Sikh community.
SGPC Adds Institutional Weight to Opposition
The Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, the apex religious body of Sikhs, has echoed the concerns raised by Akal Takht. SGPC president Harjinder Singh Dhami has joined the chorus of condemnation, asserting that the central government's proposal is unacceptable to the Sikh community.
Dhami emphasized that the land in question falls under protected categories and should remain undisturbed. He expressed apprehension that the government's move appears to be part of a larger pattern affecting Sikh religious and community interests. The SGPC president stated unequivocally that his organization stands firmly with Akal Takht on this critical issue.
Broader Implications and Community Response
The strong reaction from Sikh religious institutions underscores the sensitivity of land matters involving religious and community properties. Both leaders have made it clear that they perceive this proposal as going against the interests of the Sikh community, potentially affecting their religious and cultural presence in the region.
The condemnation from these prominent religious authorities signals the beginning of organized resistance against the central government's proposal. Community leaders are mobilizing support and preparing to launch broader protests if the government doesn't reconsider its position. The situation continues to develop as Sikh organizations across the country are expected to join this movement.
This confrontation comes at a time when several religious and community groups have been increasingly vocal about protecting their properties and rights. The Sikh community's unified response demonstrates their determination to safeguard what they consider vital to their religious and cultural identity.
