In a significant move to streamline property registration, the Karnataka High Court has instructed the state government to create a new workflow within the Kaveri 2.0 software system. This new procedure is specifically designed for the mutation of properties based on civil court decrees.
Court's Directive and Timeline
The court has issued a clear directive to the Principal Secretary of the Revenue Department. The order, given on 24 November 2025, mandates the formation of a joint legal-technical committee. This committee has a crucial dual mission: to design and implement the necessary modifications to the Kaveri 2.0 system and to ensure the smooth execution of property mutations following civil court orders.
A strict deadline of six months has been set for this committee to complete the system overhaul. This timeline emphasizes the urgency the court places on resolving the procedural hurdles faced by citizens.
Ensuring Accountability and Oversight
Beyond just creating the new workflow, the High Court's order includes a robust mechanism for monitoring and accountability. The newly formed joint committee will not only build the system but will also be responsible for overseeing its implementation on the ground.
A key part of this oversight involves conducting periodic audits at the taluk level. This step is intended to ensure that the new process is being followed correctly and efficiently across all local revenue offices, preventing delays and potential malpractices.
Implications for Property Owners
This judicial intervention is expected to have a major impact on property transactions in Karnataka. Mutation of property records is a critical step that legally recognizes a new owner. Previously, individuals who obtained property rights through civil court decrees often faced challenges in getting these changes reflected in the official Kaveri 2.0 records.
The creation of a dedicated workflow promises to simplify this process, bringing greater transparency and reducing bureaucratic delays for countless citizens. This decision underscores the judiciary's role in leveraging technology to improve governance and public service delivery.
