The Delhi High Court on Wednesday delivered a scathing critique of the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) during a hearing concerning wrestler Vinesh Phogat's exclusion from the Asian Games selection trials. The court took strong exception to the WFI's characterization of Phogat's Olympic disqualification as a 'national shame,' questioning the federation's stance and labeling its selection policy as 'retrograde.'
Court Questions WFI's Remarks and Policy
Justice Subramonium Prasad, presiding over the case, expressed deep concern over the WFI's approach. The court observed that the federation's rule changes may have unfairly penalized Phogat, particularly during her maternity break. The judge noted that such alterations to selection criteria could be seen as targeting individual athletes and undermining their careers.
The High Court further remarked that the WFI's policy appeared to lack foresight and fairness, especially in light of Phogat's achievements and her status as one of India's most decorated female wrestlers. The court emphasized that the federation should encourage athletes rather than penalize them for circumstances beyond their control.
Background of the Case
Vinesh Phogat, a Commonwealth Games gold medalist and multiple-time Asian Games medalist, was excluded from the selection trials for the upcoming Asian Games. The WFI cited her disqualification from the Tokyo Olympics due to weight issues as the reason, along with her subsequent maternity break. However, the Delhi High Court found these justifications insufficient and possibly discriminatory.
The court's intervention came after Phogat filed a petition challenging the WFI's decision. Her legal team argued that the federation's actions were arbitrary and violated her fundamental rights as an athlete. The court has now sought a detailed response from the WFI, with the next hearing scheduled for next week.
This case has reignited debates about governance in Indian sports federations and the need for transparent, athlete-friendly policies. The Delhi High Court's strong words are seen as a warning to sports bodies to adhere to principles of natural justice and fairness.
