Kotak Defends Gambhir: 'Everyone Blaming Him Feels Like Agenda'
Kotak defends Gambhir amid criticism over pitch

Kotak Comes to Gambhir's Defense Amid Growing Criticism

In a recent development that has stirred the cricket community, former Indian cricketer Sitanshu Kotak has voiced strong support for Gautam Gambhir amid mounting criticism regarding pitch conditions. Kotak expressed concern that the persistent blaming of Gambhir appears to follow a deliberate pattern, stating it sometimes feels like an agenda-driven campaign.

Gambhir's Transparent Approach Praised

Kotak specifically commended Gambhir for his upfront admission about wanting specific pitch conditions for matches. The former opener openly acknowledged that he requested particular wicket characteristics, demonstrating a level of transparency rarely seen in modern cricket administration.

According to Kotak's observations, the curator involved in the process made genuine efforts to accommodate the team's requirements. The ground staff worked diligently to implement Gambhir's vision for the playing surface, ensuring that the team's strategic requests were properly addressed in the final pitch preparation.

The Timeline of Events

The controversy emerged following matches played in November 2025, with criticism initially focusing on pitch conditions that some observers considered overly favorable to certain playing styles. The situation escalated when Gambhir publicly confirmed his involvement in pitch discussions, a move that Kotak believes demonstrates leadership accountability.

Kotak emphasized that Gambhir's straightforward approach should be appreciated rather than criticized, especially in an era where team management often avoids taking public responsibility for such decisions. The former cricketer's comments highlight the challenging environment facing cricket administrators when making strategic decisions about playing conditions.

As the discussion continues within cricket circles, Kotak's defense of Gambhir raises important questions about how pitch preparation decisions should be evaluated and whether criticism should focus on results rather than the decision-making process itself.