Mumbai Footballers Protest Artificial Turf Installation at Colaba Ground
Mumbai Footballers Protest Artificial Turf at Colaba Ground

Mumbai Footballers Stage Protest Against Artificial Turf Installation at Colaba Ground

In a significant development in Mumbai, scores of football players and their coaches from the Colaba-Cuffe Parade area staged a protest on Friday against the conversion of a mud-layered recreational ground into artificial turf. The protesters claimed this move was being implemented "against the wishes of the local public" and raised concerns about the impact on the sporting community.

Protest Halts Excavation Work at Sabina Chandrashekhar Ground

On Friday morning, members of the Colaba Back Garden (Sabina Chandrashekhar ground) Bachao Samiti arrived at the maidan located beside Cooperage. According to fishermen's union leader Devendra Tandel, who is a member of the Samiti, the group successfully forced the contractor to halt the ongoing excavation work. The contractor subsequently complained to Colaba police, who summoned the footballers for an explanation regarding the disruption.

Jitendra 'Raju' Tandel of the Samiti pointed to clause 11 in the BMC's permission letter, which explicitly states that no construction can be carried out at this site. He emphasized that the construction of artificial turf would significantly reduce the playing area, thereby shrinking team sizes from 11-a-side to 6-a-side. Additionally, he highlighted safety concerns, noting that "turf also causes grievous injuries as compared to a fall in the mud" and questioned who would be responsible for covering hospital bills resulting from such injuries.

Political Allegations and Counterclaims

The Samiti alleged that the project was being driven by state assembly speaker MLA Rahul Narwekar, his brother Makrand Narwekar (a three-term local BJP corporator), and Rachna Narwekar. However, Makrand Narwekar countered these claims in a statement to TOI, describing the objections as "intentional" and "only by a specific set of people."

Narwekar argued that the project was being politicized when it was actually designed to benefit the entire locality. He pointed out that astroturf access in most areas is paid, while this facility would be completely free of cost, with the BMC not charging anyone for its use. Civic officials supported this stance, confirming that all necessary permissions were in place and that nothing had been done unlawfully.

Political Intervention and Community Concerns

Meanwhile, Shiv Sena (UBT) MLA Aaditya Thackeray intervened by writing to Sarah Thomas, chairperson of the Garden Sports & Recreation Society, which is implementing the project. In his letter, Thackeray urged reconsideration of the move, referencing a previous proposal to construct a swimming pool in the same garden that was scrapped due to opposition from local citizens.

Thackeray noted that he had learned about the astroturf proposal and that several residents had expressed opposition, preferring the ground to remain a mud surface. He emphasized that the current mud ground allows children to play freely and safely.

Another footballer, Saurabh Meher, echoed these concerns, stating that no players or residents were consulted about the changes. He warned that the turf would alter the natural mud maidan, which has historically spawned national-level footballers. "It is our only access to proper practice for big matches," Meher said, adding that they had complained to BMC's A ward, alleging that the construction violates the mandate of beautification.

Broader Implications for Mumbai's Sporting Infrastructure

This protest highlights ongoing tensions between modernization efforts and preserving traditional sporting spaces in urban areas. The Colaba ground has served as a crucial training facility for local footballers, and its conversion could have far-reaching effects on the community's access to affordable and safe playing areas.

As the debate continues, stakeholders are calling for greater community consultation and transparency in urban development projects. The outcome of this dispute may set a precedent for how recreational spaces are managed and developed in Mumbai and other Indian cities facing similar challenges.