Job Seeker's Viral Post Exposes AI Interviewer: 'Her Head Bobbed Too Much'
Reddit User's AI Interview Experience Goes Viral

The Unsettling Discovery: When the Interviewer Wasn't Human

An anonymous Reddit user has shared a bizarre job interview experience that has taken the internet by storm, revealing how they were unexpectedly interviewed by an artificial intelligence bot instead of a human recruiter. The post has ignited intense discussions about the growing role of AI in hiring processes and the ethical implications of such practices.

The candidate described receiving what appeared to be a standard email invitation for an online interview. Nothing seemed unusual initially as they clicked the link and joined the video call. "The video popped up, and there was my interviewer. She smiled, nodded, and asked questions," the user recounted in their now-viral post.

The Telltale Signs of an AI Interviewer

However, the candidate soon noticed something was amiss. The interviewer's head movements appeared slightly mechanical and repetitive, with small, frequent twitches occurring every few seconds. Initially dismissing these signs as potential internet connectivity issues, the user continued with the interview.

"Then we dive into the questions. I answered, she responded, but the way she talked... it's too perfect. No hesitation, no 'uh'," the candidate explained. The unnaturally flawless responses and scripted behavior eventually raised suspicions, prompting the job seeker to test the interviewer by asking a counter-question: "Why do you think this role matters?"

The situation became increasingly strange when the screen froze momentarily before resuming smoothly, as if nothing had happened. This technical glitch, combined with the perfectly polished responses, confirmed the candidate's growing suspicion that they were interacting with an AI system rather than a human recruiter.

Growing Debate About AI in Hiring Processes

The viral post has sparked widespread discussion about transparency in modern recruitment practices. The central question raised by the candidate resonates with many job seekers: "I'm not against AI in hiring, but if an interviewer is basically a talking bot, shouldn't candidates at least be told?"

Social media platforms have exploded with reactions from users sharing similar experiences. One commenter noted, "If the interviewer can be AI then candidates should also be allowed to use AI to match the energy." This sentiment reflects growing concerns about the power imbalance in AI-mediated interviews.

Another user recalled their own encounter with AI interviewing technology: "I think I was interviewed by AI on a phone interview. It was... uncanny. Sounded human in many ways, it was just... off in a way I can't quite quantify."

The discussion has also highlighted more extreme cases, with one person mentioning: "AI interviewer is nothing new, I think I saw one video where AI interviewers suddenly interview between themselves mid-interview, leaving the jobseeker dumbfounded."

The incident underscores broader questions about the future of employment processes and the ethical responsibilities of companies implementing AI solutions. As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly sophisticated, the line between human and machine interaction continues to blur, raising important considerations about consent, transparency, and fairness in professional settings.