Smartphone Makers Resist India's Source Code Review Proposal Over IP and Security Fears
Smartphone Makers Resist India's Source Code Review Plan

Smartphone Makers Push Back Against India's Source Code Access Proposal

The Indian government's plans for a new mobile phone security framework have created significant unease among global smartphone manufacturers and digital rights groups. This development has reignited the debate about how much control the state should exercise over consumer technology. At the heart of the controversy lies a proposal that could force smartphone companies to share their source code for official review.

While the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology insists that consultations are still ongoing and denies any current plan to demand source code access, the issue has become a major point of contention. The government argues that stricter oversight is necessary to protect users from growing cyber threats and digital fraud in a market where smartphone penetration continues to expand rapidly.

Why Source Code Matters to Manufacturers

Smartphone makers express serious concerns about this potential requirement. They argue that mandatory access to source code threatens their most valuable intellectual property. This code represents years of engineering work and billions of dollars in research and development investment. For companies like Apple, Samsung, and Google, their proprietary software provides crucial competitive advantages in a crowded marketplace.

Manufacturers also warn that wider access to sensitive system code could actually weaken device security rather than strengthen it. Modern smartphone security depends on limiting deep system visibility while enabling rapid patching of vulnerabilities. They fear that any requirement for prior review of updates could delay critical security patches, leaving users exposed to emerging threats.

The Government's Security Rationale

From the government's perspective, source code review would allow independent verification that devices function as claimed. Officials want assurance that smartphones do not contain hidden vulnerabilities or backdoors that could be exploited at scale. With India projected to have more than one billion smartphone users, the government believes such oversight is necessary to reduce systemic risks in digital payments, banking, and government services.

The debate reflects India's broader effort to expand telecom-style security oversight beyond networks to end-user devices. The Indian Telecom Security Assurance Requirements, which previously focused on core telecom equipment, are now being extended in draft form to smartphones. This signals a shift in how the government views consumer devices—not merely as personal gadgets but as part of the country's critical digital infrastructure.

Global Comparisons and Industry Resistance

Globally, few governments require routine access to proprietary source code for consumer devices. The United States and European Union have taken different approaches, focusing on secure-by-design rules, conformity assessments, and vulnerability reporting rather than source code access. Even in China, where regulations are often more intrusive, access to source code has been contested, with companies like Apple resisting such demands.

Civil society groups in India have raised parallel privacy concerns about deeper state involvement in device software. They warn that such measures could enable surveillance and question whether adequate safeguards would be implemented. The Internet Freedom Foundation has pointed out that government documents already mention source code testing, despite official denials of such plans.

What Comes Next in the Debate

The government has pushed back against claims that it plans to force companies to hand over source code. MeitY officials have stated that consultations are ongoing and that industry feedback will be considered. There are precedents for course correction—in late 2025, the government faced backlash over a directive to pre-install a mobile security app and later clarified that the app would not be mandatory.

India accounts for approximately one in five smartphones sold globally, with major brands competing aggressively for market share. Any move to mandate deep access to device software would therefore have implications far beyond India's borders. For now, discussions continue as all stakeholders recognize that decisions about smartphone security, privacy, and control will shape India's digital ecosystem for years to come.