Judge Orders Trump Admin: Pay Food Benefits in Days
A federal judge mandates immediate distribution of food assistance benefits to American families, delivering a legal blow to the Trump administration's delayed pandemic relief efforts.
A federal judge mandates immediate distribution of food assistance benefits to American families, delivering a legal blow to the Trump administration's delayed pandemic relief efforts.
In a significant legal blow to Trump-era policies, federal judges have ruled that the former president cannot restrict SNAP food assistance benefits for low-income Americans. This landmark decision protects millions from hunger.
In a significant ruling, a federal court has ordered the Trump administration to maintain food stamp benefits despite the ongoing government shutdown, ensuring millions of Americans won't go hungry.
The Supreme Court clarifies that in-house legal advisors cannot invoke client-attorney privilege under Section 132 of the Evidence Act during income tax searches, marking a significant legal interpretation.
Federal judge strikes down Trump-era requirement for documentary citizenship proof in voter registration, dealing major blow to election integrity measures.
In a landmark ruling, a federal judge has permanently barred any future administration from reinstating Trump-era policy requiring citizenship documentation for voter registration, marking a significant victory for voting rights advocates.
In a significant legal setback for the Trump administration, federal judges have ordered the continuation of food assistance benefits, safeguarding millions of Americans from potential hunger during government funding uncertainties.
Federal court halts Trump administration's attempt to enforce work requirements for food stamp recipients during pandemic, protecting vital nutrition benefits for vulnerable citizens.
Hip-hop billionaire Sean 'Diddy' Combs has been moved to federal prison to serve his four-year sentence for prostitution-related offenses. The music icon's dramatic fall from grace marks one of entertainment's biggest scandals.
In a landmark judgment, Karnataka High Court clarifies that guarantors cannot be discharged from their obligations without full repayment or substitution by another surety. Learn how this ruling strengthens financial accountability.
In a significant judgment, Karnataka High Court rules disciplinary authorities cannot conduct endless fresh inquiries against employees, setting crucial legal precedent for government service matters.
In a significant legal development, the Madras High Court has dismissed an IPS officer's petition seeking to quash the defamation case filed by cricket legend MS Dhoni. Get exclusive details on the court's ruling and what happens next in this high-profile
Delhi High Court imposes heavy costs on a litigant who attempted to mislead the court by misrepresenting himself, marking a strong stance against abuse of legal process.
Discover why Supreme Court vacations are essential for judicial efficiency and quality judgments, not mere holidays. An in-depth analysis of how breaks sustain India's justice system.
A taxpayer's victory over Income Tax Department reveals crucial rules about cash deposits and presumptive taxation. Learn how proper documentation saved him from unnecessary tax liability.
In a groundbreaking verdict, Supreme Court protects vehicle owners from insurance claim rejections due to route deviation. Learn how this ruling transforms motor accident compensation in India.
In a groundbreaking judgment, Madras High Court declares cryptocurrency trading legal in India and classifies profits as taxable income. Discover how this ruling reshapes India's crypto landscape and what it means for your digital investments.
In a pivotal ruling ahead of Lok Sabha elections, Supreme Court rejects 100% EVM-VVPAT verification but mandates new transparency measures. Get exclusive insights on the game-changing verdict.
Supreme Court delivers historic judgment protecting accident victims - insurance companies must pay compensation even if vehicles deviate from approved routes. Major win for consumer rights in India.
In a significant judicial development, the Supreme Court has transferred the trial of a hit-and-run accident case involving a judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi, citing concerns over fair trial proceedings.
The International Court of Justice issues urgent measures demanding Israel permit UN humanitarian aid flow into Gaza, while UN's own operational challenges during the conflict come under scrutiny.
In a groundbreaking judgment, Gujarat High Court empowers single mothers by allowing passport renewals for children without requiring consent from estranged fathers. This landmark decision addresses a critical bureaucratic hurdle faced by countless women
In a major relief for tourism, NGT permits daily access to Kufri's scenic Mahasu Peak trail for horses and visitors, ending seasonal restrictions while ensuring environmental protection.
Supreme Court delivers crucial verdict favoring landlords in eviction case, ruling tenant's son's signature on rent receipts isn't mandatory. Learn how this landmark judgment impacts property owners and tenants across India.
In a major relief to COVID-19 victims' families, the Supreme Court has upheld the Centre's decision allowing private doctors to certify COVID deaths for insurance claims. Learn how this landmark ruling simplifies compensation process.
A federal judge in Chicago demands answers from Border Patrol Commander Sean Gallagher regarding controversial tear gas deployment during Trump's Operation Midway Blitz. Legal showdown escalates over immigration enforcement tactics.
In a landmark judgment, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal orders massive compensation after fatal BMW accident claims young man's life. Details of the case and legal implications.
As Jerome Powell's term nears its end, speculation intensifies about his potential successor. Scott Bessent reveals five frontrunners for the most powerful economic role in America.
In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court has ruled that special courts cannot be stripped of their authority to order the release of vehicles seized under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. This landmark judgment clarifies judicial pow
In a major setback for the Central Government, the Supreme Court has rejected its plea against implementing MGNREGA in West Bengal. The court questioned the Centre's 'selective release' of funds and upheld the Calcutta High Court order.