The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) has faced a legal challenge over its three-language mandate for Class 9 students. The matter has been taken to the Supreme Court, with the next hearing scheduled for next week. Petitioners argue that the policy infringes upon students' and parents' rights to choose languages freely, violating constitutional guarantees of linguistic freedom.
Background of the Policy
The CBSE introduced the three-language formula for Class 9 as part of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. The policy requires students to study three languages, including at least one Indian language. Schools have been directed to implement this from the academic session 2026-27. However, many stakeholders have raised concerns about the feasibility and imposition of the rule.
Petitioners' Arguments
The petitioners, including parents and educational activists, contend that the mandate is arbitrary and lacks flexibility. They argue that it forces students to study languages they may not be interested in, adding to academic burden. Moreover, they claim it disregards regional diversity and the choice of schools and parents. The plea seeks a stay on the implementation until a comprehensive review is conducted.
CBSE's Stand
The CBSE has defended the policy, stating it aims to promote multilingualism and national integration. The board maintains that the rule aligns with NEP 2020's vision of holistic education. It also clarifies that schools can offer a range of languages, and students can opt for those available. However, critics say this does not address the lack of choice in many schools.
Supreme Court Intervention
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the petition urgently. A bench is likely to examine whether the policy violates Article 29(1) (protection of minorities' language) and Article 30 (right of minorities to establish educational institutions). The court may also consider the practicality of implementation in diverse states. The hearing next week will be crucial in determining the future of the mandate.
This development has sparked a wider debate on language policy in Indian education. While some support the move for promoting Indian languages, others fear it may undermine English and regional languages. The verdict will have implications for millions of students across CBSE-affiliated schools.
