The ongoing turmoil within the Malayalam film actors' union, AMMA, has taken a legal turn as actress Ansiba Hassan approaches the Thrippunithura Magistrate Court. She has filed a case against fellow actress Lakshmipriya and a female Sub-Inspector from the Thrippunithura Women's Police Station, escalating internal conflicts that have increasingly become public.
Actress Seeks FIR Through Court Petition
According to a report by English Mathrubhumi, Ansiba Hassan petitioned the court to register an FIR against the accused based on her complaint. She had previously submitted similar complaints against Lakshmipriya, SI Reshma, and Lakshmipriya's husband to the Chief Minister and other authorities. However, after an inquiry, the police reportedly concluded that the allegations lacked sufficient grounds. Ansiba later filed another complaint with the police but alleged before the court that no FIR was registered. She also claimed that political influence prevented police action.
Court Directs Police to Submit Report
The Thrippunithura Magistrate Court has accepted the petition and directed the police to submit a report regarding the complaint. The court is expected to make a final decision after reviewing the report. This legal dispute emerges at a crucial time as AMMA is set to hold its general body meeting soon, adding more fuel to the internal fire within the organization regarding its functioning.
Internal Rift Ahead of General Body Meeting
The controversy began with Ansiba's resignation from the post of Joint Secretary of AMMA. She has spoken out against the organization's functioning, accusing certain members of damaging its image. One of her main accusations was against actor Tini Tom, who allegedly made defamatory comments. In response, actress Lakshmipriya is planning to file a Rs 10-crore defamation case against Ansiba.
Disclaimer: The information in this report is based on a legal hearing as reported by a third-party source. The details provided represent allegations made by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case is ongoing, and a final verdict has not been reached. The publication does not claim that the allegations are true.
