American pop sensation Sabrina Carpenter has publicly demanded that the White House immediately cease using her music. The controversy erupted after a video shared by the official White House account on Monday featured her 2024 hit song 'Juno'.
The Controversial Video and Carpenter's Furious Response
The video in question depicted scenes of federal immigration enforcement officers pursuing and detaining individuals. Bystanders were shown recording the activities on their mobile phones, all set to the upbeat track of Carpenter's popular song. The post was published on December 2, 2025.
Reacting swiftly and with clear anger, Sabrina Carpenter took to her social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to voice her strong disapproval. In a post directed at the White House, the singer did not mince her words.
"this video is evil and disgusting," Carpenter wrote from her verified handle @SabrinaAnnLynn. She emphatically added, "Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda." Her statement, posted on the same day, leaves no room for interpretation regarding her stance on the administration's use of her art.
Artistic Integrity vs. Political Messaging
This incident highlights the ongoing tension between artists and political entities over the use of copyrighted music. Musicians often object when their work is co-opted to endorse or amplify political messages they do not support. For Sabrina Carpenter, whose fanbase is largely young and global, the association of her song 'Juno' with aggressive immigration enforcement actions was clearly a step too far.
The White House has yet to issue a public response to the singer's demand for removal and her sharp criticism. The video remains on their official social media channel at the time of this reporting, continuing to use the track without the artist's consent.
Broader Implications and Public Reaction
This is not the first time a political body has faced backlash for using a pop song without an artist's blessing, but the direct and forceful language from a major star like Carpenter makes this a significant event. It raises questions about the ethical use of popular culture in government propaganda and the rights of creators.
The public reaction online has been largely supportive of the singer's position, with many fans and observers praising her for taking a clear ethical stand. The episode underscores the power of celebrity voice in contemporary political discourse and serves as a reminder to institutions about the importance of securing proper permissions and considering the context of the art they use.
