Streamer Clavicular Walks Out of $15,000 Interview Over Peter Thiel Question, Sparks Online Feud
In a dramatic and tense live stream moment, popular streamer Clavicular, whose real name is Braden Peters, abruptly ended an interview and demanded reporter Mika leave his house after she inquired about his alleged connections to billionaire investor Peter Thiel. The incident, which unfolded on the streaming platform Kick, has ignited a fierce public dispute, with both parties trading sharp accusations and no verified evidence emerging to support either side's claims.
The Explosive Interview Cut Short
The confrontation occurred during a scheduled 30-minute interview for which Mika says she paid $15,000. According to her account, she began asking questions about Clavicular's business funding and the widespread online rumors linking him to Peter Thiel. "The second that I brought up Peter Thiel, he panicked," Mika stated in a follow-up video. "He then flipped it on me and said I was the one funded by Peter Thiel."
On camera, Clavicular quickly terminated the interview, accusing Mika of being financed by Thiel and instructing her to depart his residence. The streamer challenged her to provide proof, with Mika later emphasizing his demand: "Show me one receipt." This phrase became a central point in the ensuing online debate, highlighting the lack of concrete documentation from either individual.
Mika's Detailed Account and Allegations
After leaving the stream, Mika posted a video explaining her perspective. She clarified that she asked about Thiel because the rumors are pervasive online, including speculation that Thiel assisted in Clavicular's release from jail and had charges dropped—claims with no public verification. Mika asserted that Clavicular's team accused her of having blockchain ties to Thiel-backed groups but presented no evidence.
"He said that his team did research on me and that there was blockchain ties from Thiel funded parties to my wallet, which is there's zero proof of that, because it never happened," Mika explained. "He literally couldn't show one single receipt. Show me one receipt that I am Peter Thiel funded, or Peter Thiel backed. I'll wait."
Mika also expressed frustration over the financial aspect, noting, "You charge $15,000 for 30 minutes, and then you can't handle a single question... and then you're calling me a scammer. But literally, what you just did is scamming." She emphasized that she conducted the interview solo, without external backing.
Clavicular's Public Response and Escalating Conflict
Braden Peters, aka Clavicular, fired back on social media platform X after Mika posted about the incident, writing, "Thanks for the 15k of dark money and crypto scams. Scammer gets scammed." This retort further fueled the controversy, drawing attention from users across X and various streaming platforms.
The clash has rapidly spread, with both sides issuing pointed public statements. However, as of now, there is no confirmed evidence that Peter Thiel funds either Mika or Clavicular. Past interactions add context but no clarity: last year, Peters mentioned that Thiel invited him to his Hollywood Hills home, and online users have speculated that a supporter known only as "P" could be Thiel. Neither Peters nor Thiel has officially confirmed any financial relationship.
Unverified Rumors and Ongoing Dispute
The core of the dispute revolves around unsubstantiated rumors and allegations. Key points include:
- Mika's payment of $15,000 for a 30-minute interview that was cut short.
- Clavicular's accusation that Mika is funded by Peter Thiel, without providing proof.
- Mika's counter-accusation that Clavicular scammed her by ending the interview prematurely.
- Online speculation about Thiel's involvement in Clavicular's legal matters, which lacks public documentation.
Despite the heated exchange, the situation remains a public back-and-forth with no verified documents shared by either party. The absence of receipts or concrete evidence leaves the truth ambiguous, while the incident underscores the volatile nature of live streaming and influencer journalism.
As the feud continues to trend online, observers are left questioning the ethics of high-paid interviews and the spread of unverified claims in digital media. Both Clavicular and Mika stand by their versions, ensuring this controversy will likely persist until more information surfaces.
