Economic Security Takes Center Stage in India-US Relations Amid Global Shifts
Economic Security Becomes Key in India-US Relations

Economic Security Emerges as Central Pillar in India-US Strategic Partnership

A seemingly routine paragraph on "economic security" within the recent India–US joint statement outlining an interim trade deal framework carries profound implications for global strategy. This concept, while not entirely novel, has now ascended to unprecedented prominence, marking the definitive return of economic statecraft to the heart of grand international strategy.

The New Grammar of Geopolitics

The joint declaration commits both nations to "strengthen economic security alignment to enhance supply-chain resilience and innovation through complementary actions to address non-market policies of third parties, as well as cooperation on inbound and outbound investment reviews and export controls." This language represents a fundamental evolution in international relations.

We are witnessing the emergence of a new commercial grammar of geopolitics where trade flows, technological advancement, capital movements, and supply chain integrity now define the strategic balance with equal weight to traditional military capabilities. This represents a significant departure from the post-Cold War era.

The Historical Context of Separation and Reintegration

Throughout history, economic, industrial, and technological prowess has always formed the bedrock of hard power. However, the relative political harmony among major powers following the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991, coupled with the rapid acceleration of globalization, encouraged a deliberate separation between economic policy and security considerations.

This artificial division began eroding steadily throughout the 2010s as Western nations experienced mounting backlash against globalization and strategic tensions escalated dramatically between the United States, China, and Russia. The turning point arrived during Donald Trump's first presidential term from 2017 to 2021.

The Trump Presidency as Catalyst for Change

President Trump openly challenged America's deep economic interdependence with China, identifying trade deficits as national vulnerabilities and arguing against allowing Beijing to hollow out American manufacturing capacity. While foreign policy establishments initially dismissed these arguments as protectionist rhetoric, political reality proved otherwise.

Trump's successor, President Joe Biden, who served from 2021 to 2025, embraced similar logic focused on restoring domestic manufacturing prowess, reducing dependence on geopolitical rivals, and rebuilding technological dominance. External events further accelerated this strategic shift.

Global Crises Accelerate the Economic Security Imperative

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical vulnerabilities in global supply chains, while Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine crystallized emerging security concerns. By the time G7 leaders convened in Hiroshima in 2023, "economic security" had officially replaced globalization promotion as the highest international priority.

Donald Trump's return to the White House has dramatically accelerated this transformation. The 2025 National Security Strategy explicitly affirmed that "economic security is fundamental to national security," and Trump's economic security vision extends beyond China to include America's closest allies—the European Union, Japan, South Korea, and India.

Russia's Position in the New Economic Landscape

With a GDP of approximately $2.5 trillion compared to $31 trillion for the United States, $20 trillion for the European Union, and a similar figure for China, Russia does not qualify as an economic peer to these major powers. However, Moscow's abundant natural resources—from hydrocarbons to critical minerals—grant it significant strategic relevance.

This explains why Trump has pursued enthusiastic outreach to Vladimir Putin, even as the United States pressures India to reduce its energy purchases from Russia. Reports of Russia proposing a massive $12-trillion economic partnership to Trump underscore Moscow's desire to dilute its dependence on Beijing and Washington's interest in separating Russia from China.

India's Strategic Reassessment and Policy Pivot

Whether such dramatic geopolitical realignment proves achievable remains uncertain, but the mere possibility forces India to reassess the trajectory of US relations with both Russia and China. A potential entente between Trump and Putin following a Ukraine peace settlement could render current US concerns about Indian purchases of Russian oil temporary.

The Ukraine conflict and its impact on India serves as a crucial reminder that nations caught in great power crossfires, even unintentionally, inevitably pay a price. For now, however, India's choice between greater access to the US market and discounted Russian oil presents a clear strategic direction.

Delhi has demonstrated significant policy evolution, moving beyond traditional foreign policy vocabulary that has become increasingly disconnected from contemporary realities. The government's recent focus on signing free-trade agreements with Western partners marks an important strategic pivot.

India's Western Reorientation and Strategic Alignment

After years of primarily looking eastward for trade partnerships, Delhi has acknowledged the significant economic complementarity with Western economies. Indian diplomacy began adopting the language of economic resilience and trusted supply chains in the late 2010s, particularly within the Quad framework.

India's trade policy has finally aligned with this strategic vision following Delhi's withdrawal from RCEP negotiations for Asia-wide free trade in 2019, subsequent focus on Western trade deals, and successful closure of several agreements in recent months.

The China Factor in India-US Economic Convergence

The joint statement's reference to "non-market policies of third countries" clearly targets China. India's participation in recent US initiatives like Pax Silica ministerial meetings and critical minerals groups reflects a definitive strategic judgment: India cannot afford to remain unaligned in the deepening geoeconomic contestation between the United States and China.

While economic convergence between India and the United States in addressing China's dominance of global manufacturing and critical mineral supply chains is undeniable, transforming this convergence into sustained cooperation presents significant challenges.

The Path Forward for Indian Strategy

The inherent volatility of US policies and dynamic geoeconomic relationships between the United States, China, and Russia demand that Delhi continuously nurture and adapt its foreign economic policy. Ultimately, India's ability to secure its position in this unfolding geoeconomic world will depend even more critically on the depth and success of its domestic economic reforms and technological modernization efforts.

The integration of economic policy with foreign policy strategy has become an unavoidable reality in today's international landscape, requiring nations to develop sophisticated approaches that recognize the inseparability of commercial and security interests in the twenty-first century.