A heated debate erupted in the Lok Sabha over potential privacy risks linked to the government's Sanchar Saathi initiative, with the opposition Congress voicing strong apprehensions about state surveillance.
Congress Flags Fears of Covert Surveillance
Raising the issue in Parliament, Congress MP Deepender Hooda expressed serious concerns regarding the mandatory pre-installation of the Sanchar Saathi application on all smartphones sold in India. Hooda argued that even if a user disables the app, there is no definitive way to guarantee all its background functions are completely inactive. This, he contended, opens the door for potential violations of the fundamental right to privacy and fuels suspicions of unwarranted government monitoring of citizens.
Minister Scindia's Firm Rejection of Snooping Allegations
Responding to these allegations, Union Communications Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia offered a categorical reassurance. He firmly stated that the app is fully secure and that surveillance is impossible. "Na snooping sambhav hai, na snooping hoga," Scindia declared, translating to "snooping is neither possible, nor will it happen." He emphasized that the core purpose of the Sanchar Saathi platform is to protect users by empowering them with tools to safeguard against fraud and cyber threats.
The Mandate and User Control Provisions
The controversy stems from a ministry order dated November 28, which mandates that all mobile phone manufacturers must pre-load the Sanchar Saathi app on new devices. Furthermore, the app must be provided via software updates for existing phones. As per the directive, the application must be visible and easily accessible during the initial device setup process.
However, the government clarified a critical aspect of user agency. Users retain the ultimate freedom to delete the app from their devices if they choose not to utilize its features. This provision is highlighted as a key element ensuring individual control and choice, countering claims of forced usage.
The parliamentary exchange underscores the ongoing tension between national security initiatives, technological mandates, and the inviolable right to personal privacy in the digital age.
