ASI Informs CIC: No Records Available on Sambhal Mosque's Construction Origins
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has officially informed the Central Information Commission (CIC) that it does not possess any records clarifying whether the historic Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh, was constructed on vacant land or after demolishing an earlier structure. This significant clarification emerged in response to a Right to Information (RTI) application filed by Delhi-based lawyer Satya Prakash Yadav.
RTI Query Seeks Historical Clarification on 16th-Century Structure
Satya Prakash Yadav's RTI application specifically sought detailed information about the 16th-century mosque, including whether it replaced any temple or ruins, the identity of the landowner at the time of its reported construction in 1526, and any documents establishing historical ownership rights. In its written response, ASI stated unequivocally that no such information was available within its official records.
During the appeal hearing before the CIC on February 23, the applicant argued that crucial information had been improperly denied on grounds of non-availability. The ASI countered this by submitting that it had shared all documents on file and "cannot be directed to generate or gather information that it does not maintain." After careful consideration of both submissions, the commission declined to intervene further and dismissed the appeal, observing that ASI's response complied with the provisions of the RTI Act.
Ongoing Legal Dispute and Historical Context
The Sambhal Jama Masjid has been a subject of intense dispute since November 2024, when a local civil court ordered a survey of the mosque following a petition by Hindu groups alleging that the structure was built after demolishing a temple. Tragically, violence erupted during the survey operation, resulting in four fatalities and injuries to several individuals, including police personnel.
Reacting to these latest developments, mosque president Zafar Ali emphasized that all necessary records have already been submitted to the high court and ASI through proper legal channels. Advocate Mohammad Jamal Akhtar provided additional context, noting that many historical religious sites lack original title documents but are well-documented in archival records. He stressed the importance of addressing such sensitive matters with restraint and strictly within the legal framework.
Broader Implications and Community Response
This case highlights the complex challenges surrounding historical verification of religious sites in India. The ASI's position underscores the limitations of existing archival documentation for certain historical structures, while the ongoing legal proceedings reflect deeper societal tensions regarding historical narratives and religious heritage.
Legal experts suggest that the CIC's decision to uphold ASI's response sets a precedent regarding the boundaries of information disclosure under the RTI Act when records are genuinely unavailable. Meanwhile, community leaders continue to advocate for peaceful resolution through established legal processes, emphasizing the need for historical research that respects both archaeological evidence and communal harmony.
