The Calcutta High Court has declined to intervene in the ongoing investigation by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) into the controversial no-show of football legend Lionel Messi at a scheduled event in West Bengal. A division bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul, delivered the ruling, stating that the probe is still in its preliminary stages.
Court Cites Preliminary Stage of Investigation
The bench, which included another judge, made it clear that no substantial material was presented before it to justify judicial interference at this point. The court held that the petitioners failed to establish that the current investigation or enquiry is "vitiated or polluted" in any manner. This legal terminology means the court found no evidence that the probe has been compromised or conducted with bias.
Essentially, the judiciary has given a green light for the SIT to continue its work without any immediate legal obstacles. The decision underscores the principle that courts are generally reluctant to interrupt investigative processes in their early phases unless there is a clear demonstration of malpractice.
Background of the Messi Event Controversy
The case stems from a major event that was widely promoted featuring Argentine superstar Lionel Messi. The event, which generated significant public excitement and ticket sales, ended in disappointment and allegations of fraud when Messi did not appear as promised. This led to public outcry, multiple police complaints, and demands for a thorough investigation into the organizers and the circumstances surrounding the failed appearance.
In response to the escalating situation, authorities formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to look into the allegations of cheating and conspiracy. The SIT probe aims to unravel the chain of events, contractual agreements, and the roles of various entities involved in planning the event.
Legal Implications and Next Steps
The High Court's refusal to interfere is a significant development. It indicates that the legal system is allowing the investigative agencies the necessary space to gather evidence and build their case. The ruling was made on 23 December 2025, as confirmed by the news agency PTI.
For now, the SIT will proceed with its enquiry. The petitioners, likely individuals or entities connected to the event's organization, have not succeeded in their attempt to stall or challenge the probe through this legal avenue. The matter can potentially be revisited in court at a later stage, depending on the findings of the investigation or if new evidence of procedural violation emerges.
This ruling keeps the spotlight firmly on the Messi event fiasco, ensuring that the probe will continue to be a subject of public and legal scrutiny in West Bengal. All eyes will now be on the SIT's progress and any future findings it may present.
