Special Court Permits Elgar Parishad Accused to Travel for Family and Health Reasons
A special court in Mumbai has granted permission to Professor Hany Babu, an accused in the high-profile Elgar Parishad case, to travel to his hometown in Kerala. The court's decision allows him to visit his 80-year-old ailing mother and seek medical treatment for gallbladder stones, marking a significant development in his prolonged legal battle.
Court's Conditional Approval Amid NIA Opposition
While Professor Babu requested a two-month leave from the court's jurisdiction, the court imposed restrictions to ensure compliance with bail conditions previously established by the Bombay High Court. The judge emphasized the humanitarian aspect, stating in the order: "I hold that, to go and meet his age-old mother is just consideration that too, after near about 6 good long years, entitle the accused to go to visit and stay with her for few days."
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) strongly opposed the plea, arguing that the offences involved are serious and that Babu could receive medical treatment in Mumbai. The agency raised concerns about the lack of medical certificates regarding his mother's health and expressed fears that he might engage in "unlawful conspiracy" if permitted to leave the jurisdiction.
Background of the Case and Bail Conditions
Hany Babu was arrested in April 2020 in connection with the Elgar Parishad case and spent over five years in custody before being granted bail in December 2025. His application to the court cited the urgent need to meet his elderly mother and undergo necessary treatment for gallstones, highlighting personal and health exigencies.
The court's decision underscores a balance between legal scrutiny and compassionate considerations, particularly given the duration of his incarceration and family circumstances. This ruling follows a pattern of judicial interventions in cases involving prolonged detentions and health-related appeals.
Implications and Legal Context
The Elgar Parishad case has been a focal point of legal and political discourse, with multiple accused facing charges under stringent laws. Babu's travel permission, albeit limited, reflects the judiciary's role in addressing individual rights amidst broader security concerns.
- The court restricted the travel period to align with bail conditions, preventing potential misuse.
- NIA's opposition highlights ongoing tensions between investigative agencies and defense claims in sensitive cases.
- This development may influence similar applications by other accused in high-stakes legal proceedings.
As the case continues, this order sets a precedent for handling requests based on familial and medical grounds, emphasizing the need for documented evidence and judicial discretion in such matters.
