Delhi High Court Denies Accused's Request in Red Fort Attack Case
The Delhi High Court has refused to entertain a plea filed by an accused in the Red Fort attack case seeking permission to meet his lawyer at the National Investigation Agency (NIA) headquarters. The significant ruling was delivered by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma on November 21, 2025.
Court's Reasoning Behind the Decision
Justice Sharma noted that the accused had failed to produce any evidence showing that the trial court had rejected his prayer for meeting his legal counsel at the NIA headquarters. The court emphasized that the petitioner could not demonstrate any specific order passed by the trial court denying such request, which became a crucial factor in the decision-making process.
The bench observed that without proper documentation or evidence of the trial court's stance on the matter, the High Court could not intervene in the case. This procedural aspect played a pivotal role in shaping the court's final verdict on the application.
Legal Implications and Next Steps
The rejection of this plea marks another development in the ongoing legal proceedings concerning the Red Fort attack case. The accused will now need to approach the trial court first and obtain a clear order regarding his request before any further consideration by higher courts.
Legal experts suggest that this decision reinforces the importance of following proper judicial hierarchy and procedures in such sensitive matters. The case continues to be closely monitored given its national security implications and the seriousness of the charges involved.
The Red Fort attack case remains one of the most significant national security matters being handled by the National Investigation Agency, with multiple accused persons currently undergoing trial under various sections of anti-terror laws.
