In a recent development, Dhami has leveled serious allegations against the Special Investigation Team (SIT) handling the case of 328 holy saroops, accusing it of overreach and interference in the affairs of the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC). Dhami claimed that the SIT is exceeding its mandate and attempting to undermine the autonomy of the SGPC, which is a key religious body for Sikhs.
Background of the 328 Holy Saroops Case
The case involves the recovery of 328 holy saroops (copies of the Guru Granth Sahib) that were allegedly mishandled or desecrated. The SIT was constituted to investigate the matter thoroughly. However, Dhami contends that the team has been overstepping its bounds by delving into areas beyond its purview.
Allegations of Interference
Dhami specifically pointed out that the SIT has been questioning SGPC officials and staff in a manner that suggests an attempt to interfere with the committee's internal functioning. He argued that such actions are not only unwarranted but also violate the spirit of religious freedom and institutional autonomy.
Dhami stated: "The SIT seems to have forgotten its limited role. Instead of focusing on the recovery and preservation of the holy saroops, it is meddling in SGPC matters. This is a clear case of overreach."
Reactions and Implications
The SGPC has also expressed concern over the SIT's approach, with some members calling for a review of the investigation's scope. Legal experts suggest that if the allegations are proven, it could lead to a redirection of the probe or even legal action against the SIT.
Meanwhile, the SIT has defended its actions, stating that all inquiries are within the legal framework and aimed at uncovering the truth behind the mishandling of the holy saroops.
This controversy has sparked a broader debate on the balance between investigative authority and institutional rights. As the case unfolds, all eyes will be on how the SIT and the SGPC navigate this delicate issue.
