The Haryana Human Rights Commission (HHRC) has taken serious note of what it describes as "unjustified delay, procedural lapses, and apparent police apathy" in a series of cases stemming from a long-running dispute in Panchkula. In a strongly worded order, the rights panel has sought detailed explanations from several senior police officers, highlighting concerns that such conduct reflects poor supervision and undermines public confidence in law enforcement.
Commission Criticizes Police Inaction and Selective Enforcement
In proceedings arising from a complaint filed by Akash Bhalla, the commission observed that despite repeated directions, the Panchkula police failed to take timely action. This has raised significant concerns about selective enforcement and potential misuse of criminal law. Bhalla alleged that multiple FIRs were registered against him and his family in a dispute that was essentially civil in nature, leading to prolonged harassment.
Disturbing Delay in Pending FIR
The human rights panel noted that 23 FIRs were registered against the complainant. While many of these have already been quashed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court or cancelled by the police themselves, one particular case, FIR No. 315, has remained pending for more than three years without any clear investigative outcome. The commission termed this delay as "disturbing," emphasizing that such unexplained inaction amounts to a denial of timely justice.
Show-Cause Notices Issued to Senior Officers
Invoking its powers under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, the HHRC has issued show-cause notices to several senior police officers in Panchkula. The officers directed to submit detailed replies, records, and status reports include:
- ACP Vikram Nehra (Sector 5)
- ACP Dinesh (Sector 7)
- ACP Rakesh (Sector 14/20)
- SHO Rupesh (Sector 5)
- SHO Hari Ram (Sector 14)
- SHO Somvir Dhaka (Sector 20)
Warning of Monetary Penalties
The commission has warned that monetary penalties of Rs 20,000 each could be imposed for non-compliance with its directives. This stern measure underscores the seriousness with which the HHRC views the lapses in police procedure and supervision. The panel stated that such conduct not only reflects a lack of procedural diligence but also erodes public trust in the law enforcement machinery.
Broader Implications for Law Enforcement
The HHRC's intervention highlights broader issues within police administration in Haryana. By pointing out poor supervision and procedural failures, the commission is calling for systemic improvements to ensure that justice is not delayed or denied. The officers have been given a clear mandate to explain their actions, with the threat of further action if their responses are unsatisfactory.
This case serves as a reminder of the critical role human rights bodies play in holding law enforcement agencies accountable. It also underscores the need for police reforms to address delays and apathy that can undermine the very foundation of justice and public confidence.
