Telangana High Court fines HYDRAA commissioner ₹50,000 for defying orders
High Court fines HYDRAA chief ₹50,000 for flouting orders

The Telangana High Court has imposed a fine of ₹50,000 on the commissioner of the Hyderabad Disaster Response and Assets Monitoring and Protection Agency (HYDRAA) for failing to comply with court directives and missing deadlines to file a counter-affidavit in a long-running land dispute. This rare and stern action was taken by Justice NV Shravan Kumar’s bench on June 8, after the commissioner ignored a conditional order issued on April 8 that granted a final opportunity to submit the agency’s response regarding a two-acre parcel of land at Vengalrao Nagar.

Fine to be paid to Chief Justice Relief Fund

The bench directed that the fine be paid to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, clarifying that the registry will accept any future counter-affidavits from HYDRAA only after payment. The matter has been adjourned to June 15 for further hearing.

Petitioners’ allegations

According to the petitioners, who are legal heirs of the late Farhatullah, the land was officially handed over to them on March 15, 2008, following Supreme Court orders, and they have remained in continuous possession since. The court noted that status quo orders had been issued in 2025, restraining HYDRAA and the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) from interfering with the property or dispossessing the petitioners.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

However, the petitioners alleged that on March 18 this year, HYDRAA officials, accompanied by police, trespassed onto the land, demolished the compound wall, and erected barbed fencing. They also installed signboards claiming the property belonged to the Housing Board integrated housing scheme as an open layout space, despite the agency reportedly having full knowledge of the Supreme Court’s prior rulings on the land.

Related complaint

In a connected matter, the petitioners further alleged official inaction regarding their representations against the coercive occupation of 5,808 square yards within the same survey number. The court is expected to hear the case next on June 15.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration