The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a directive to restore police security to an advocate who had previously been provided protection due to threats to his life. The court's order came in response to a petition filed by the advocate, who argued that the withdrawal of security had exposed him to grave danger.
Background of the Case
The advocate, whose identity has not been disclosed in the court order, had been receiving police protection following credible threats. However, the security was later withdrawn without proper justification, prompting the advocate to approach the High Court seeking its restoration.
Court's Observations
During the hearing, the High Court bench observed that the state has a constitutional duty to protect the lives of its citizens. The court noted that the advocate's life was under threat and that the withdrawal of security was arbitrary. The bench emphasized that the right to life is paramount and cannot be compromised.
- The court directed the Haryana government to restore the police security within a week.
- It also ordered the state to ensure that the advocate receives adequate protection as per the threat assessment.
- The court warned that any failure to comply would result in contempt proceedings.
Implications of the Order
This ruling reinforces the principle that the state cannot unilaterally withdraw security from individuals facing genuine threats. Legal experts have welcomed the decision, stating that it upholds the rule of law and the right to safety. The case also highlights the challenges faced by legal professionals who often become targets due to their work.
Reactions
The advocate's counsel expressed satisfaction with the court's decision, stating that it provides a sense of security to their client. Meanwhile, the Haryana government has not yet commented on the order. It is expected that the state will comply with the directive to avoid legal repercussions.
This development is significant as it sets a precedent for similar cases where individuals under threat seek protection from the state. The High Court's intervention underscores the judiciary's role in safeguarding fundamental rights.
