High Court Demands Punjab DGP Affidavit Over Delayed Investigations into Advocate Attacks
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has expressed significant dissatisfaction with the slow pace of investigations into a series of attacks targeting advocates and crimes committed against their family members in Punjab. In a recent hearing, the court directed the Director General of Police (DGP) of Punjab to submit a fresh status report accompanied by an affidavit, highlighting concerns over laxity and prolonged delays in these sensitive cases.
Court's Scrutiny of Three Key Incidents
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Parmod Goyal examined three specific incidents reported in Punjab and Chandigarh. These cases include the murder of the wife of senior advocate K K Goyal, a theft involving advocate Vishal Handa, and another theft linked to an unnamed advocate. The bench issued notices while hearing these matters, emphasizing the need for accountability and swift action.
Details of the Cases Under Review
In the case of K K Goyal's wife, the incident occurred on the intervening night of December 29 and 30, 2025, with an FIR registered on December 30. While all accused have been arrested, the investigation remains incomplete, and the recovery of stolen property has not been fully achieved. Notably, some recovered items were allegedly misappropriated after the arrests by Uttar Pradesh Police, leaving the property untraced.
For advocate Vishal Handa's theft case, which dates back to January 27, 2025, the police admitted that no arrests have been made even after a year. The FIR was initially filed against unknown persons, with the complainant later providing leads such as phone numbers and suspect identities. Police efforts are currently focused on tracing a suspect believed to be in Bihar.
In the third case, a theft of gold ornaments in Chandigarh on December 24, 2025, suspects have been identified through CCTV footage and are thought to be residents of Indore. Despite raids conducted in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Gujarat, the accused remain absconding, and no recovery has been made.
Court's Observations and Directives
After reviewing sealed status reports, the bench acknowledged satisfaction with the nature and speed of investigations conducted by Chandigarh Police. However, it raised serious concerns regarding the Punjab cases, citing "laxity" and a lack of progress. The court specifically noted, "We are not satisfied with the fact that relating to an incident, which took place one year ago, the culprits have not yet been found," pointing to delays in recovery efforts.
In response, the court directed the Punjab DGP to submit a detailed status report with an affidavit concerning two specific FIRs: FIR No. 6 dated January 27, 2025, registered at Phase 8 police station in Mohali, and FIR No. 310 dated December 30, 2025, registered at Phase 1 police station in Mohali. The matter has been scheduled for further hearing on February 13.
Implications for Legal and Judicial Affairs
This development underscores the High Court's proactive role in overseeing law enforcement accountability, particularly in cases involving legal professionals. It highlights ongoing challenges in criminal investigations within Punjab and sets a precedent for judicial intervention to ensure timely justice. The court's emphasis on affidavits and detailed reports reflects a commitment to transparency and efficiency in addressing crimes against advocates and their families.
