The Telangana High Court on Wednesday directed the Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited (HMRL) and the state government to submit their responses to a petition accusing HMRL of encroaching on public property by setting up commercial stalls under and near metro stations. The petition, filed by B Akhil, a regular metro commuter, claims that while authorities actively remove footpath encroachments by hawkers, they remain indifferent to similar violations by HMRL.
Court's Observations and Directions
Justice NV Shravan Kumar, presiding over the hearing, remarked, “Such commercial stalls also affect and obstruct free traffic movements.” He noted that the matter requires a thorough examination of whether authorities have the power to grant permissions for stalls and kiosks on public premises that inconvenience regular commuters and pedestrians. The judge directed HMRL and government counsels to present their responses and relevant government orders before the court. The next hearing is scheduled for June 17.
Petitioner's Allegations
Vijay Gopal, counsel for the petitioner, submitted that Akhil had lodged complaints regarding encroachments at ESI Hospital and Ameerpet metro stations, but no action was taken. He provided photographs of the alleged encroachments and sought directions to the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) and other authorities to remove them.
HMRL's Defense
In response, HMRL's counsel argued that the commercial kiosks and stalls are part of the corporation's non-fare revenue generation and asset monetization initiatives, approved by the competent authority under applicable policies. “These permissions were granted after obtaining the approval from the competent authority and in accordance with the applicable policies. Moreover, these kiosks and stalls have been set up in designated areas identified by HMRL, subject to the condition that pedestrian movement, public access, safety requirements, and commuter convenience shall not be obstructed in any manner,” the counsel stated. He added that periodic inspections are conducted to ensure compliance with safety norms and conditions.
The court will continue hearing the matter on June 17, seeking clarity on the legality of such commercial activities on public land.
