In a significant judicial ruling, the Karnataka High Court has restored the appointment of a government pleader who was removed from his position within just 24 hours of assuming office. The court delivered a strong message against arbitrary state action while upholding constitutional principles.
Court's Strong Stand on Constitutional Principles
Justice M Nagaprasanna, while delivering the judgment on November 26, 2025, made a powerful observation about the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. The judge emphasized that Article 14 of the Constitution of India represents the "golden thread that is woven through the entire fabric of the Constitution."
Justice Nagaprasanna further elaborated that "every bead of the State action should pass through that golden thread" and made it clear that "any action of the State cannot be arbitrary." This strong constitutional position formed the foundation of the court's decision to reinstate the government pleader.
The Case of Annappa Sank
The ruling came in response to a petition filed by Annappa Sank, who had been appointed as a government pleader only to be removed from the position within a day. The swift termination raised serious questions about the propriety and legality of the state government's decision-making process.
The High Court examined the circumstances surrounding Sank's appointment and subsequent removal, finding the state government's action lacking in proper justification and due process. The court's intervention highlights the judiciary's role as a check on executive power and ensures that government actions comply with constitutional mandates.
Broader Implications for Governance
This judgment carries significant implications for administrative law and governance practices in Karnataka. By invoking Article 14, which guarantees equality before law and equal protection of laws, the court has reinforced that:
- State actions must be reasonable and non-arbitrary
- Government decisions affecting individuals must follow due process
- Constitutional principles override administrative convenience
The timing of the decision, coming just hours after the removal on November 26, 2025, demonstrates the judiciary's responsiveness to urgent matters involving fundamental rights and government accountability.
This ruling serves as an important reminder to all state authorities about their constitutional obligations and the limitations on their power to make arbitrary decisions affecting individuals' rights and appointments.
