Madras HC Directs DVAC Probe into Contract Irregularities Worth Crores
Madras HC orders DVAC probe into contract irregularities

The Madras High Court on Thursday directed the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) to conduct an inquiry and take appropriate action regarding alleged contract irregularities worth several crores in various departments of the state government.

Court Order Details

Justice G K Ilanthirayan passed the order on a plea moved by Veerappan, a resident of Villupuram, alleging that information obtained through RTI has brought to light that several contracts floated by the state government have been awarded to a particular company based on forged documents, resulting in substantial financial loss to the government.

Government Submission

Representing the state, Advocate-General Vijay Narayan submitted that the chief engineer of PWD has constituted a committee on May 26 to investigate the alleged irregularities.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Recording the submission, the court directed the committee to complete its inquiry within eight weeks and submit a report to the DVAC. The court further directed the DVAC to conduct an appropriate investigation based on the committee’s report and to take legal action against any persons found responsible for the alleged irregularities.

Petitioner's Allegations

According to the petitioner, since 2022, at least 12 infrastructure contracts across different government departments were obtained by two companies—Sea Rock Infrastructures and Sri Pathy Associates Pvt Ltd—through forged documents and certificates. The projects include:

  • Construction work for the Tamil Nadu Housing Board at CIT Nagar and Mogappair
  • Desilting work at the mouth of the Kosasthalaiyar River in Ennore
  • Construction of 294 apartment units at A V Pathi Nagar in Thanjavur
  • Irrigation infrastructure and flood-prevention work undertaken by the water resources department in Pudukkottai, Ranipet, and Mayiladuthurai districts

The petitioner alleged that the two companies participated in government tenders by portraying themselves as competitors while ensuring that no genuine competitors could participate. “Representations had been submitted in August 2025 to the DVAC, the water resources department, and the PWD, but no action had been taken so far,” he said.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration