Meerut Interfaith Wedding Sparks Legal Row Over 'Love Jihad' Allegations
An interfaith couple's planned wedding in Meerut has ignited a significant controversy after local police registered a First Information Report (FIR) against the groom under Uttar Pradesh's Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. The case was initiated following allegations of "love jihad" raised by right-wing groups, casting a shadow over the union of Akanksha Gautam and Shahvez Rana.
Couple's Background and Wedding Plans
The couple, both in their mid-20s and residents of Meerut city, were scheduled to marry on February 13. Akanksha Gautam follows Buddhism and works with a private bank, while Shahvez Rana is a medical professional from another community. Their wedding was intended to be solemnized according to Buddhist traditions, reflecting Akanksha's faith.
Police Action and Legal Charges
Meerut SP (Rural), Abhijeet Kumar, confirmed that a case was registered against the accused man based on a complaint from the woman's kin. The FIR includes charges under BNS section 351 (3) for criminal intimidation, along with relevant sections of the Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. No arrests have been made so far, but the legal proceedings have introduced uncertainty into the couple's plans.
Allegations from the Bride's Uncle
In his complaint, Akanksha's uncle, Premchand Gautam, alleged deception and raised concerns about the groom's identity. He claimed that Akanksha was misled by a man named 'Sahil', whose real name is Shahvez Rana. The uncle accused the groom of intending to grab property and conspiring to marry her after manipulation and brainwashing. "I fear for my niece's safety," he stated, highlighting his apprehensions.
Couple's Response and Counter-Allegations
Akanksha Gautam strongly objected to the interference by right-wing groups, asserting that both families support the marriage. "My family is fine with the marriage, and so is Sahil's. So who gave these outfits the right to interfere in my matters?" she questioned. She explained that she herself gave Shahvez the name 'Sahil', and there is no wrongdoing involved. The stress from the controversy has taken a toll on her, and she warned that those creating ruckus would be held responsible if anything happens to her.
Akanksha cited a property dispute with her uncle, alleging that his concerns are driven by vested interests. "Ever since my father's death three years ago, he has been eyeing our property. He knew that I was in a relationship with Sahil for the past six years. His concerns for me are fake," she added, suggesting the issue is being raised to settle scores.
Family Support and Constitutional Stand
Her mother, Lata Rani, emphasized their Buddhist identity and commitment to constitutional rights. "We are Buddhists and not Hindus, and whatever we are doing is within the framework of the Indian Constitution," she stated. She affirmed her full support for her daughter and Shahvez, vowing that they will get married regardless of obstacles. If necessary, the family is prepared to approach the high court to secure their rights.
Opposition from Right-Wing Groups
Meanwhile, Sachin Sirohi, president of Hindu Suraksha Sangathan, declared that his group would oppose the wedding. "If they attempt to solemnise the marriage elsewhere, we will reach there too," Sirohi added, indicating ongoing resistance from certain quarters. This stance has further complicated the situation, adding to the couple's challenges.
Groom's Silence and Broader Implications
Neither Shahvez Rana nor his family were available to comment on the matter, leaving their perspective unaddressed in the public discourse. The case highlights broader issues surrounding interfaith marriages in India, particularly in regions with stringent anti-conversion laws. It raises questions about personal freedom, family disputes, and the role of external groups in private matters.
The incident underscores the tensions that can arise when cultural, religious, and legal factors intersect, affecting the lives of individuals seeking to marry across community lines. As the couple navigates these challenges, their determination to proceed with the wedding reflects a broader struggle for autonomy and rights in the face of societal pressures.
