The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court has taken serious note of alleged widespread illegal trade in wild birds and animals at the city's Lakadganj Sunday market. Acting on a public interest litigation (PIL) filed on Friday, a division bench issued formal notices to senior forest, police, and municipal authorities, demanding their response to the grave allegations.
Shocking Evidence of Cruelty Presented in Court
The PIL was submitted by petitioner Charanjeet Singh Renu and argued by advocate Ajay Maheshwari. It presented compelling photographic and video evidence to the court. This evidence reportedly shows protected birds, rabbits, exotic species, and various other animals being kept in deplorable conditions. The visuals depict creatures stuffed into tiny cages, deprived of basic food and water, and being traded openly at the weekly market.
The petitioner informed the court that traders are actively promoting this unlawful market on social media platforms. Notably, YouTube videos uploaded as recently as November 23 were cited, which allegedly advertise the sale of wildlife. Despite a detailed written complaint being filed with authorities on September 24, followed by several evidence-backed reminders, the PIL claims that no concrete action was taken, forcing the judicial plea.
High Court Demands Answers from Top Authorities
The division bench, comprising Justices Anil Kilor and Rajnish Vyas, acted promptly on the petition. Notices have been issued to a roster of high-ranking officials, seeking their stance on the alleged violations. The recipients include:
- The Deputy Conservator of Forests
- The Chief Wildlife Warden
- The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
- The Nagpur Municipal Commissioner
- The Commissioner of Police
- The State Board for Wildlife
The petition frames the market's operation as a severe breach of multiple laws. It cites violations of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, and the Pet Shop Rules of 2018. Furthermore, it argues that the inaction of authorities violates constitutional mandates under Articles 21 (Right to Life), 48A (protection of environment), and 51A(g) (fundamental duty to protect wildlife).
Plea Seeks Permanent Closure and Statewide Action
The PIL does not merely seek an investigation; it demands comprehensive and permanent remedies. The primary requests put before the High Court include:
- The permanent closure of the illegal wildlife trade at the Lakadganj Sunday market.
- Weekly patrolling and monitoring by combined teams of forest and police departments.
- Registration of First Information Reports (FIRs) against the traders involved.
- Proper rehabilitation of all rescued animals and birds.
- A statewide ban on similar illegal roadside bird and animal markets.
In his arguments, advocate Ajay Maheshwari condemned the market, labeling it "a fountainhead of cruelty" and a symbol of the "persistent failure of statutory duties." He asserted that unchecked trade has allowed wildlife offences to flourish openly. "This is not merely a market. It is an organised centre of cruelty and a direct challenge to the rule of law. Authorities have been silent for years," Maheshwari told the court.
The petitioner also made a public appeal, urging citizens to report wildlife crimes and refrain from purchasing animals from illegal vendors. The plea underscores that "cruelty thrives only when ignored," highlighting the role of public awareness and action. The case will proceed as the court awaits responses from the notified authorities.
