Bombay High Court Criticizes Nagpur Police for Failing to Secure CCTV Evidence in Stalking Case
The Nagpur police faced severe criticism from the Bombay High Court for their failure to secure key CCTV evidence in an alleged stalking and attempted hit-and-run case. A division bench of Justices Anil Pansare and Nivedita Mehta expressed strong disapproval, terming the police's explanation as inadequate and highlighting non-compliance with judicial directives.
Court Questions Police Actions and Seeks Explanation
The bench demanded an explanation from senior police officials regarding why crucial footage was not collected, despite a November 13, 2025, court order that explicitly directed them to personally oversee the investigation and ensure the collection of CCTV footage and other material evidence. In an affidavit, the police admitted that while cameras in the area were examined, the footage was not seized or preserved as evidence.
The court observed that a mere inspection without seizure of the footage did not satisfy its order, and found merit in the petitioner's arguments that the probe could not be considered fair or transparent without this vital evidence.
Background of the Case and Allegations
The case originated from a petition filed by a woman who alleged that on May 6, 2025, around 8:45 PM, she was harassed and abused, with the accused attempting to run her over in the Sitabuldi police limits. Initially, the police did not register her complaint, forcing her to approach the State Women's Commission. An FIR was eventually filed on June 30, 2025, but only under minor charges such as abusive behavior, hurt, and criminal intimidation, excluding graver offenses like attempt to murder and outraging modesty.
Police Response and Court's Reaction
Following the court's November 13 order, the police later filed an A-summary report on November 18, 2025, suggesting the complaint might have been exaggerated and citing a lack of sufficient evidence. However, counsel for the complainant, Ashwin Ingole, opposed this closure, arguing that the investigation was incomplete without the CCTV footage and pointed to the non-compliance of the court's explicit directions.
The bench pulled up the police for failing to adhere to its earlier directives, and last week, issued a show-cause notice to senior officers. The matter has been posted for further hearing on April 22, when the court will decide the next course of action after reviewing their response.
Key Points of the Case
- A woman from Nagpur alleged stalking and an attempt to kill her by running a car over her on May 6, 2025.
- Police initially refused to register the complaint, leading her to seek help from higher authorities.
- The FIR was filed under lesser charges, omitting serious allegations like attempt to murder.
- The Bombay High Court intervened, ordering personal supervision by senior officers to collect evidence.
- Police inspected but did not seize CCTV footage, prompting court criticism and a show-cause notice.
This case underscores ongoing concerns about police accountability and the importance of adhering to judicial orders in ensuring justice for victims.
