Nashik Court Rejects TCS Employee's Anticipatory Bail in Rape Case
Nashik Court Rejects TCS Employee's Anticipatory Bail

The Nashik Road district and additional sessions court on Saturday rejected the anticipatory bail plea of a woman employee of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) in connection with a rape case and offences under the Prevention of Atrocities Act. The accused woman, whose whereabouts remain unknown since the FIR was registered, had filed her anticipatory bail application on April 20.

Court's Decision

After hearing arguments from the prosecution, defence, and lawyers representing the complainant, additional sessions judge Kedar Joshi denied her relief. Special public prosecutor Ajay Misar stated, "The court found the accusations to be serious, warranting a detailed investigation and custodial interrogation to uncover the full extent of the crime."

Prosecution's Arguments

The prosecution argued that the woman was a key conspirator who allegedly planned the offence with the co-accused and actively assisted them. Misar added that the woman's role was crucial in executing the crime.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Related Case: Custody Extended for Four Other TCS Employees

In a related development, the court of additional chief judicial magistrate S V Lad on Saturday extended the custody of four other TCS employees accused in a linked case involving sexual harassment and religious coercion till May 5. The special investigation team had arrested the four accused on April 23 in a case registered by the Mumbai Naka police under BNS sections 75 (sexual harassment), 79 (acts intended to insult a woman's modesty), 299 and 302 (acts and words intended to outrage religious feelings). They were already in judicial custody in another case at the time of their arrest.

Details of the Case

Police said a total of nine cases have been registered against eight TCS employees in connection with the matter. The four accused were initially remanded in police custody till April 29, which was later extended to May 2 and now to May 5. Misar, who is also the special public prosecutor in this case, said the complainant is a male. The prosecution sought extended custody to probe the alleged use of intoxicating substances mixed into the complainant's drinks, examine laptops and electronic devices of the accused, and scrutinise bank statements to determine whether any financial transactions were linked to alleged religious conversion attempts.

Taking into account the prosecution's arguments, the court extended the police custody of the accused till May 5.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration