Rajasthan High Court Receives Bomb Threat Email, Police Launch Investigation
In a concerning security incident, the Rajasthan High Court in Jaipur received a bomb threat via email on the morning of February 6, 2026. According to official police reports, the high court registrar was the recipient of the threatening communication, which claimed that three explosive devices had been strategically planted within the court premises.
Immediate Police Response and Security Sweep
Upon receiving the alert, local law enforcement agencies sprang into immediate action. A comprehensive security operation was launched, involving multiple police teams and bomb disposal squads. The authorities conducted a meticulous and thorough search of the entire high court complex, including courtrooms, administrative offices, corridors, and surrounding areas.
After an extensive investigation, the police confirmed that no suspicious items or explosive devices were found on the premises. The threat was deemed non-credible, and normal court proceedings were allowed to resume following the all-clear declaration. However, security remains heightened as a precautionary measure.
Details of the Threatening Email
The email, which triggered the security alert, was sent to the high court registrar in the early hours of the morning. It specifically alleged the placement of three bombs within the court building, causing immediate concern among court officials and staff. Police cybercrime units have been mobilized to trace the origin of the email and identify the sender.
"We take all such threats with the utmost seriousness," stated a senior police official involved in the case. "Our teams responded promptly to ensure the safety of everyone at the high court. While nothing was found, we are investigating this as a case of criminal intimidation."
Impact on Court Operations and Public Safety
For a brief period, court activities were disrupted as security protocols were activated. Lawyers, litigants, and court staff were subjected to enhanced security checks upon entry. The incident has raised questions about the vulnerability of judicial institutions to such threats and the need for robust cybersecurity measures to prevent hoax communications.
Authorities have assured the public that there is no ongoing threat to safety and that investigations are continuing to apprehend those responsible for the false alarm. This event underscores the critical importance of vigilance and rapid response mechanisms in protecting key government installations.
