The Himachal Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) has strongly defended its transparency and clarified its role in the ongoing Chester Hill row. Responding to queries from the state government's vigilance department, RERA officials asserted that all procedures were followed as per the RERA Act, 2016, and there was no lapse on its part.
Background of the Controversy
The Chester Hill project, located in the heart of Shimla, has been mired in controversy over alleged violations of building norms and environmental clearances. Complaints were filed by local residents and activists, leading to a vigilance probe. RERA was asked to provide details of its approvals and actions taken regarding the project.
RERA's Defense
In its submission, RERA highlighted that it had registered the project after verifying all required documents, including the building plan approved by the Shimla Municipal Corporation. The authority stated that it operates within the framework of the law and ensures transparency through its online portal, where all project details are publicly accessible.
- RERA emphasized that it had issued show-cause notices to the builder for alleged violations and had even recommended cancellation of registration if norms were not complied with.
- The authority clarified that its role is limited to regulating real estate projects and protecting homebuyers' interests, while compliance with municipal and environmental laws falls under other departments.
Vigilance Department's Scrutiny
The vigilance department is examining whether RERA failed to act promptly on complaints. However, RERA officials argued that they acted within the stipulated timelines and that the builder was given adequate opportunity to respond. They also pointed out that the matter is sub judice in the Himachal Pradesh High Court.
Industry Reactions
Real estate experts have come out in support of RERA, stating that the authority has been proactive in ensuring compliance. They noted that the Chester Hill case is a complex one involving multiple agencies, and RERA should not be singled out for delays.
The authority's clarification is expected to strengthen its position and reaffirm its commitment to transparency in the real estate sector. The vigilance department is likely to submit its report soon, which will determine the next course of action.
