Legal Luminary Raises Concerns About Judicial Independence
In a recent development that has sent ripples through India's legal community, Senior Advocate Harish Salve delivered a pointed critique of the judiciary during an interview with prominent journalist Arnab Goswami. The conversation, which took place in mid-November 2025, has sparked widespread discussion about the state of India's judicial system and the growing challenges it faces.
The Core Arguments Presented
Salve, one of India's most respected legal minds, mounted what observers are calling a sharp and unprecedented critique of the judiciary's current trajectory. While the full details of his arguments remain the subject of legal analysis, the central theme revolved around what he perceives as manufactured distrust targeting the guardians of justice in the country.
The timing of this critique is particularly significant, coming at a moment when the Indian judiciary is handling several high-profile cases that have captured national attention. Salve's stature as a former Solicitor General of India and his extensive experience appearing before the Supreme Court lends considerable weight to his observations.
Broader Implications for Indian Democracy
Legal experts across the nation are now examining the potential consequences of such a prominent figure speaking out about judicial challenges. The concept of guarding the guardians has emerged as a central theme, raising important questions about who oversees the overseers in India's democratic framework.
The discussion has also highlighted the delicate balance between constructive criticism and maintaining public confidence in judicial institutions. As the debate continues to unfold, it touches upon fundamental principles of democracy, including separation of powers, judicial accountability, and the independence of the legal system from external pressures.
This development comes at a crucial juncture for India's legal landscape, with many seeing it as part of a larger conversation about the future direction of the country's judiciary and its role in upholding constitutional values.
