Supreme Court Upholds Chhattisgarh HC Order Restricting Pastors' Village Entry
SC Dismisses Plea Against Chhattisgarh HC Order on Pastors

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Chhattisgarh HC's Order on Pastors' Village Entry

The Supreme Court of India has firmly dismissed a plea that challenged a significant order from the Chhattisgarh High Court. This order had prohibited pastors from entering certain villages in the state, sparking a legal debate over religious freedom and conversion practices.

Court's Stance on Anti-Conversion Hoardings

In its ruling, the Supreme Court declined to consider arguments against the high court's observation. The Chhattisgarh High Court had previously noted that the installation of hoardings aimed at preventing forcible religious conversion through allurement or fraudulent means cannot be deemed unconstitutional. This perspective was upheld by the top court, reinforcing the legal framework around conversion activities.

Background of the Case

The case originated from concerns in Chhattisgarh regarding alleged forced conversions in rural areas. Local authorities had put up hoardings in villages to warn against such practices, which led to legal challenges. Pastors and religious groups argued that these measures infringed upon their rights to propagate religion, but the courts have now taken a clear stance.

Key Points from the Judgment:
  • The Supreme Court supported the high court's view that preventive measures against fraudulent conversion are permissible under the law.
  • The dismissal of the plea means the restrictions on pastors' entry into villages remain in effect, pending any further legal appeals.
  • This decision highlights the ongoing balance between religious freedom and the prevention of coercive practices in India.

The ruling is expected to have broader implications for similar cases across the country, as it sets a precedent for how courts may handle issues related to religious conversion and public order. Legal experts suggest that this could influence future policies and enforcement actions in states dealing with conversion controversies.

Note: This article is based on reports from February 2026 and reflects the latest developments in the case.