The Supreme Court of India on April 30, 2026, reserved its judgment on Congress leader Pawan Khera's plea for anticipatory bail. This development follows the Gauhati High Court's refusal to grant him protection from arrest in a case involving alleged forgery and defamation linked to the wife of Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma.
Arguments in Court
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Khera, argued against what he termed 'humiliating' custodial interrogation. He contended that the allegations did not warrant such treatment and that Khera was willing to cooperate with the investigation.
Assam Government's Stance
The Assam government, represented by its counsel, countered that the evidence of fake passports is serious and requires deeper investigation. They emphasized the need for custodial interrogation to uncover the full extent of the alleged conspiracy and to prevent tampering with evidence.
Case Background
The case stems from accusations that Khera was involved in forging documents and making defamatory statements against the wife of Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma. The Gauhati High Court had earlier dismissed Khera's anticipatory bail plea, prompting him to approach the Supreme Court.
Next Steps
The Supreme Court bench, after hearing both sides, reserved its judgment. The decision is expected to be pronounced in the coming days, which will determine whether Khera will be granted anticipatory bail or face potential arrest and custodial interrogation.
This case has drawn significant political attention, with Congress leaders rallying behind Khera and the ruling BJP in Assam pressing for a thorough investigation.
